摘要
就帮助犯既遂的结果归责而言,学理上尽管在形式上均认可因果关系乃其必要条件,但在具体论证过程中则通过将条件关系缓和为促进关系,实现了有别于传统因果关系理论体系的路径转型。在帮助犯因果关系的判定中以"促进关系"替代"条件关系"的本质是一种"风险增加"概念的具体运用,与帮助行为结果犯属性相悖,也无法证立共犯因果性的特殊化。帮助行为所引发之不法构成要件事实,包括正犯行为本身也包括构成要件结果,两者之间因果关系之判断应采用合法则性条件说。
As to attributing the consequence of an accomplished offense to an accessory, although scholars nominally recognize that the causality is a necessary condition, they shift to a path different from the traditional causality theory system in the specific reasoning process by reducing the conditional relationship to promotional relationship. The essential thought reducing the conditional relationship to promotional relationship is a specific application of the concept of increasing risks, which is likely to be contrary to the nature of the result crime of an assisting act and unable to justify the specialization of the causality of the joint crime. The illegal fact of constitutive element caused the assisting act includes the principle's act itself and the consequence of constitutive element. The causality shall be judged on the basis of law-complying conditional theory.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第2期127-137,共11页
Political Science and Law
基金
中国法学会部级法学研究课题"网络共犯归责模式的教义学检讨与重塑"[课题编号:CLS(2017)D54]的研究成果
关键词
帮助犯
风险
因果关系
Accessory
Increasing Risks
Law-complying Conditional Theory
