摘要
容许风险理论的背后蕴含着利益平衡和功利主义的法哲学思想,并且受到规范论与目的理性主义的影响,如何理解容许风险将影响归责路径的选择。刑法归责的关键应当从主观层面展开,在故意犯罪当中需要结合认识因素、规范保护的目的和被害人自陷风险等理论加以检视,在过失犯罪当中需要基于新过失论的观点,利用结果的回避义务划定容许风险的范围。另外,以网络中立的帮助行为为例证,研究如何实现刑法的归责与网络的健康发展协同统一。网络技术中立的本质与容许风险相关联,通过处理好主观层面的“明知”与行业规范、规范的保护目的与技术困境、自陷风险与保证人地位三对关系,实现对网络中立帮助行为的主观归责。
The theory of admissible risk contains the legal philosophy of interest balance and utilitarianism,and is influenced by normative theory and purpose rationalism.How to understand admissible risk will affect the choice of imputation path.The key of Criminal Law Imputation should be carried out from the subjective level.In intentional crime,it needs to be examined in combination with cognitive factors,the purpose of normative protection and the theory of victims’self trapping risk.In negligent crime,it needs to use the combined avoidance obligation to delimit the scope of allowable risk based on the viewpoint of new negligent theory.Furthermore,taking the network neutral helping behavior as an example,this paper studies how to realize the synergy and unity between the attribution of criminal law and the healthy development of the network.The essence of network technology neutrality is related to the allowable risk.By dealing with the three pairs of relations between subjective“knowing”and industry norms,normative protection purpose and technical dilemma,self trapping risk and guarantor status,we can realize the subjective attribution of network neutral help behavior.
出处
《刑法论丛》
2022年第3期1-25,共25页
Criminal Law Review
基金
2021年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目:《刑法与治安管理处罚法的冲突研究——以构建轻罪体系为目标》,项目编号:21YJC820040
关键词
容许风险
主观
归责
网络中立帮助行为
Allowable Risk
Subjective Imputation
Imputation
Network Neutral Help Behavior
