摘要
1871年第一部现代意义的《德国著作权法》中,只有4条具体的"合理使用"规定。20世纪后,德国修改其著作权法,并形成了"一般概括式"与"法定列举情形"分开适用的"合理使用"立法例。此立法例沿用至今,由此也可知,德国采用的是较为开放的"合理使用"立法技术。对比德国可见,我国现行《著作权法》中的合理使用立法例过于封闭,缺乏一般概括条款,并不鼓励后续创作。《著作权法(修订稿)》中新添"其他情形"和合理使用一般概括式条款是合适的,删除或明确"其他情形"的做法将僵化我国合理使用制度。但建议将"其他情形"修改为"特定、特殊情形",这既符合"三步检验法"表述,也可为今后法院的解释适用提供思路。
A In 1870, there were only four "fair use" clauses in Germany's first modern copyright law. After the 20th century, Germany revised the copyright law and formed a legislative model of "fair use", which includes "general clause" and "legally enumerated clauses" and their application is separated. This legislative model is still in use today, so it can be seen that Germany’s “fair use” adopts a relatively open legislative model. In contrast with Germany, the current legislative model of fair use in copyright law of China is too narrowed, lacks general clause and does not encourage subsequent creation. Therefore, the addition of "other cases" and the general clause of fair use in the copyright law (amendment) are appropriate, and deleting or clarifying "other situations" will rigidify the fair use system of our country. However, it is suggested to modify "other cases" to "certain special cases", which is not only to comply with the fi rst condition of "three-step test", but also to provides ideas for its future juridical interpretation and application.
出处
《电子知识产权》
CSSCI
2019年第2期4-13,共10页
Electronics Intellectual Property
基金
中国国家留学基金委2017年"建设高水平大学公派培养研究生项目"(201707080013)
