期刊文献+

“医学免疫学”形成性评价实践 被引量:32

"Medical immunology" formative assessment practice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨运用形成性评价促进深度学习策略。方法:期末考试成绩分析和调查问卷发布。对象为2014~2015学年和2016~2017学年修读《医学免疫学》课程的复旦大学基础医学院临床医学八年制和五年制学生以及基础医学专业本科生。2016~2017学年采用形成性和终结性评价相结合考评,2014~2015学年采用一次性终结性考核。结果:相对于2014~2015学年,2016~2017学年的期末考试试卷平均成绩虽无显著性差异,但期末考试试卷成绩高于85分的学生比例增加,有统计学意义。大部分学生认可形成性评价促进了深度学习。结论:开展形成性评价教学有助于应试教育向素质教育转变。 Objective:Application of formative assessment to promote deep learning.Methods:Analysis of the students′final exam test scores and release of survey questionnaires.Students who took the Medical Immunology course of the School of Basic Medical Sciences Fudan University in the academic year 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 were recruited as research subjects.In the academic year 2016-2017,a different methodology consisting of the formative and summative assessments was used to evaluate the undergraduates′achievement in contrast to the traditional one summative assessment at the end of the curriculum in the academic year 2014-2015.Results:There was no significant difference in the mean final exam test score between two groups.However,a significant increase in the proportion of students scored above 85 points was observed in the academic year 2016-2017 in comparison with the control.Most students agreed that the formative assessment promoted their deep learning.Conclusion:The formative assessment can be used to promote the transition from knowledge impartment to quality education.
作者 陆青 张伟娟 杨慧 高波 储以微 LU Qing;ZHANG Wei-Juan;YANG Hui;GAO Bo;CHU Yi-Wei(Department of Immunology,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China)
出处 《中国免疫学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第4期485-488,491,共5页 Chinese Journal of Immunology
基金 复旦大学基础医学院教改项目(2017-16) 复旦大学2018年度第一批教学研究与改革实践项目C类教学实践探索项目(2018C016)资助
关键词 形成性评价 深度学习 医学免疫学 Formative assessment Deep learning Medical Immunology
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献61

  • 1何玲,黎加厚.促进学生深度学习[J].计算机教与学.现代教学,2005(5):29-30. 被引量:1325
  • 2刘声涛,戴海崎,周骏.新一代测验理论—认知诊断理论的源起与特征[J].心理学探新,2006,26(4):73-77. 被引量:50
  • 3Hershey S.Bell,李井泉.医学生教育中形成性评价的运用[J].中国全科医学,2007,10(4):285-285. 被引量:96
  • 4R·M·加涅 L·J·布里格斯 W·W·韦杰著 皮连生 庞维国译.教学设计原理[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1999.251. 被引量:22
  • 5马道斯,斯塔弗尔比姆,斯克里文.方案的评价:历史的概观[G]//瞿葆奎,主编,陈玉琨、赵永年,选编.教育学文集(第16卷)教育评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1989:77. 被引量:1
  • 6泰勒.怎样评价学习经验的效用[G]//瞿葆奎主编,陈玉琨、赵永年,选编.教育学文集(第16卷)教育评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1989:263. 被引量:1
  • 7Scriven,M.The methodology of evaluation [G]//Tyler R.W.,Gagne,R.M.,Scriven,M.Perspectives of curriculum evaluation.Chicago:Rand McNally, 1967:39-83. 被引量:1
  • 8Bloom, B.S.Some theoretical issues relating to educational eval-uation[G]//Tyler,R.W.Educational evaluation:new roles,new means:the 63rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study ofEducation(part II).Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1969:26-50. 被引量:1
  • 9布卢姆,等.教育评价[M].邱渊,等,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,1981:230、259-260. 被引量:1
  • 10Black, P., Wiliam, D.Inside the black box: Raising standardsthrough classroom assessment[J].Phi Delta Kappan, 1998,80(2). 被引量:1

共引文献931

同被引文献322

引证文献32

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部