期刊文献+

经皮冠状动脉介入术前阿托伐他汀强化治疗对冠心病患者预后的影响 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究阿托伐他汀强化治疗配合经皮冠状动脉介入(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)手术对冠心病(acute coronary disease,CHD)患者预后的影响。方法将行PCI手术治疗的120例CHD患者随机分为观察组与对照组,各60例。2组均采用PCI手术治疗,术后口服阿托伐他汀钙片20 mg/d维持治疗,观察组术前2 h给予阿托伐他汀钙片负荷量80 mg,检测并比较2组术前和术后1 d的各项实验室指标[肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、肌钙蛋白I(TnI)及C反应蛋白(CRP)]、术前和术后1个月的血脂水平,术后随访1 a,记录2组主要不良心血管事件(major adverse cardiovascular events,MACE)发生率。结果观察组术后CK-MB、TnI、CPR[(15. 28±4. 15) U/L vs(20. 15±7. 14) U/L,(0. 15±0. 09)μg/L vs (0. 27±0. 11)μg/L,(5. 11±2. 40) mg/L vs (7. 41±4. 27) mg/L]指标低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P <0. 05);术后1个月2组血脂水平均有改善,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05),但术前2组血脂水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05);术后随访1 a,观察组MACE发生率8. 33%(5/60),低于对照组21. 67%(13/60),差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论 PCI术前强化阿托伐他汀治疗CHD具有较满意的效果及安全性,可减轻患者心肌损伤及炎症反应,降低MACE风险。
作者 姜辉
出处 《河南医学高等专科学校学报》 2019年第1期28-30,共3页 Journal of Henan Medical College
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献105

  • 1中国成人血脂异常防治指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(5):390-419. 被引量:5233
  • 2Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555. 被引量:1
  • 3Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651. 被引量:1
  • 4Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210. 被引量:1
  • 5Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13. 被引量:1
  • 6Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972. 被引量:1
  • 7Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932. 被引量:1
  • 8Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx. 被引量:1
  • 9Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes ( CURRENT-OASIS 7 ): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet,2010,376 : 1233-1243. 被引量:1
  • 10Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Cell Cardiol,2007,50 : 1742-1751. 被引量:1

共引文献489

同被引文献10

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部