摘要
选取40名16-20岁轻、中度智障青少年为被试,采用图形、词语、数字类比推理材料,探讨轻、中度智障青少年图形、词语和数字类比推理特点。结果发现:第一,无论是轻度还是中度智障青少年三种类比推理成绩均较差,正确率低于50%,数字类比推理成绩均显著地低于图形和词语推理,后二者成绩差异不显著。轻、中度智障个体二者之间三种类比推理成绩差异不显著。第二,各年龄段类比推理成绩差异不显著,所有被试的数字类比推理成绩均显著低于图片与词语类比推理。受认知水平的制约,智障青少年的类比推理能力在16-20岁之间基本保持稳定,类比推理水平低下,图形和词语推理能力优于数字类比推理能力。
This research selected forty adolescents aged 16 to 20 with mild or moderate intellectual disabilities to participate in the experiment to make analogical reasoning with figures,words and numerical materials to explore the characteristics of analogical reasoning of adolescents with mild or moderate intellectual disabilities.The results showed that:(1)The percentages of correctness of the three types of analogical reasoning were lower than 50%,of which the numerical analogical reasoning was worse than figures and words analogical reasoning;no differences were found between adolescents with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities;(2)there were no significant disparities in analogical reasoning of varied age groups while all participants’figures and words analogical reasoning was better than the numerical analogical reasoning.It concluded that the ability of analogical reasoning for adolescents with intellectual disabilities would not change with ages due to the restraints of cognitive impairment,remaining stable when individuals with intellectual disabilities are aged 16 to 20,and that the figures and words analogical reasoning were better than the numerical analogical reasoning.
作者
高华
彭泰
高少伟
GAO Hua;PENG Tai;GAO Shao-wei(School of Psychology,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350117,China;Dept.of Math,Kaohsiung Normal University,Kaohsiung 81342,China)
出处
《宁波大学学报（教育科学版）》
2019年第1期1-6,共6页
Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
基金
福建省本科高校教育教学改革研究项目(研究生教学改革项目)"基于职业胜任力的应用心理硕士(MAP)创新人才培养模式构建--以学校心理健康教育方向为例"(FBJG20180314)
福建师范大学研究生教学改革研究项目(师大研[2018]46号)
关键词
智力障碍
青少年
类比推理
analogical reasoning
adolescents
intellectual disabilities
