期刊文献+

免疫透射比浊法自建检测系统钩状效应性能确认方法的建立 被引量:4

Hook effect performance verification in laboratory-developed turbidimetric immunoassay systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的建立免疫透射比浊法自建检测系统钩状效应性能的确认方法。方法采用AU5400全自动生化分析仪,选取3种非配套免疫透射比浊法IgG试剂盒(试剂A、试剂B、试剂C),通过对不同浓度IgG样本进行检测,绘制Heidel-berger曲线,确定平衡点及安全范围。比较不同IgG试剂从抗原适量到过量的过程中,快速反应期内吸光度(A)值变化速率、达到峰值时间及上升幅度的差异,确认3种非配套IgG试剂钩状效应的识别参数。结果 3种非配套IgG试剂(试剂A、试剂B、试剂C)的Heidel-berger曲线平衡点浓度分别为49.0、42.0、105.0 g/L;安全范围分别为35.0~90.0、20.0~75.0、33.0~120.0 g/L。试剂A、试剂B、试剂C钩状效应报警的浓度范围分别为49~350、28~70、42~350 g/L。结论免疫透射比浊法自建检测系统可通过钩状效应性能确认方法建立相关识别参数,以确保检测结果的准确、可靠。 Objective To establish the method of hook effect performance verification in laboratory-developed turbidimetric immunoassay systems.Methods A total of3laboratory-developed turbidimetric immunoassay systems(Reagent A,Reagent B and Reagent C)were used for IgG with different levels.Heidel-berger curves were drawn to determine equilibrium points and safe ranges.The changes of absorbance(A),peak times and rising ranges in the rapid reaction period were observed to investigate the recognition parameters of hook effect.Results The equilibrium points of Heidel-berger curves of Reagent A,Reagent B and Reagent C were49.0,42.0and105.0g/L,respectively,and the safe ranges were35.0-90.0,20.0-75.0and33.0-120.0g/L,respectively.The hook effects of Reagent A,Reagent B and Reagent C can be identified in49-350,28-70and42-350g/L,respectively.Conclusions The recognition parameters of laboratory-developed turbidimetric immunoassay systems can be set up by performance verification of hook effect to ensure the accuracy and reliability of results.
作者 夏勇 薛灏 李明洋 纪玲 XIA Yong;XUE Hao;LI Mingyang;JI Ling(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Peking University Shenzhen Hospital,Shenzhen 518036,Guangdong,China)
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 2018年第12期1132-1135,共4页 Laboratory Medicine
关键词 钩状效应 性能确认 免疫透射比浊法 Hook effect Performance verification Turbidimetric immunoassay
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献30

  • 1Conde-Sánchez M,Roldán-Fontana E,Chueca-PorcunaN,et al.Analytical performance evaluation of aparticle-enhanced turbidimetric cystatin C assay onthe Roche COBAS 6000 analyzer[J].Clin Biochem,2010,43(10-11):921-925. 被引量:1
  • 2Seegmiller JC,Sviridov D,Larson TS,et al.Comparisonof urinary albumin quantification by immunoturbidimetry,competitive immunoassay,and protein-cleavage liquidchromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J].ClinChem,2009,55(11):1991-1994. 被引量:1
  • 3Dupuy AM,Debarge L,Poulain M,et al.Determinationof serum ferritin using immunoturbidimetry orchemiluminescent detection in comparison withradioimmunoassay a compendium of a methodologicaljuxtaposition[J].Clin Lab,2009,55(5-6):207-215. 被引量:1
  • 4Jones TG,Warber KD,Roberts BD.Analysis ofhemoglobin A1c from dried blood spot samples withthe Tina-quantRⅡimmunoturbidimetric method[J].J Diabetes Sci Technol,2010,4(2):244-249. 被引量:1
  • 5Shaikh A,Seegmiller JC,Borland TM,et al.Comparisonbetween immunoturbidimetry,size-exclusion chromato-graphy,and LC-MS to quantify urinary albumin[J].Clin Chem,2008,54(9):1504-1510. 被引量:1
  • 6Al-Turkmani MR,Law T,Kellogg MD.Performanceevaluation of a particle-enhanced turbidimetriccystatin C assay on the Hitachi 917 analyzer[J].Clin Chim Acta,2008,398(1-2):75-77. 被引量:1
  • 7Tugirimana PL,Holderbeke AL,Kint JA,et al.A newturbidimetric method for assaying serum C-reactiveprotein based on phosphocholine interaction[J].ClinChem Lab Med,2009,47(11):1417-1422. 被引量:1
  • 8Hansson LO,Grubb A,Lidén A,et al.Performanceevaluation of a turbidimetric cystatin C assay ondifferent high-throughput platforms[J].Scand J ClinLab Invest,2010,70(5):347-353. 被引量:1
  • 9Ledue TB,Collins MF,Ritchie RF.Development ofimmunoturbidimetric assays for fourteen human serumproteins on the Hitachi 912[J].Clin Chem LabMed,2002,40(5):520-528. 被引量:1
  • 10Mali B,Armbruster D,Serediak E,et al.Comparisonof immunoturbidimetric and immunonephelometricassays for specific proteins[J].Clin Biochem,2009,42(15):1568-1571. 被引量:1

共引文献20

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部