摘要
目的探讨免疫透射比浊法与干式免疫荧光法检测C反应蛋白的结果差异。方法统计分析2012年9月至2014年1月该院收治的56例各类感染性疾病患者的临床资料。结果免疫透射比浊法和干式免疫荧光法检测观察组患者的C反应蛋白水平均明显比对照组低(P<0.05),C反应蛋白阳性率均明显比对照组高(P<0.05)。结论免疫透射比浊法与干式免疫荧光法检测各种急性感染性疾病患者的C反应蛋白结果差异不显著,提示免疫透射比浊法可作为干式免疫荧光法的一种替代方法。
Objective To investigate the difference of C reactive protein level detected by immunity transmission turbidity and dry immunofluorescence.Methods The clinical data of 56 patients with various kinds of infectious diseases who were treated in our hospital from September 2012 to January 2014 was retrospectively analyzed.Results The levels of C reactive protein in the obser-vation group detected by immunity transmission turbidity and dry immunofluorescence were significantly lower than those in the control group （P〈0.05）,and the positive rate of C reactive protein was significantly higher than that in the control group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion The levels of C reaction protein detected by immunity transmission turbidity and dry immunofluorescence in patients with a variety of acute infectious diseases show no significant difference,suggesting that immunity transmission turbidity can be used as an alternative to dry immunofluorescence.
出处
《国际检验医学杂志》
CAS
2015年第16期2406-2407,共2页
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词
免疫透射比浊法
干式免疫荧光法
C
反应蛋白
immunity transmission turbidity
dry immunofluorescence
C reactive protein
