摘要
当下学界流行的"韧性"(resilience)术语是2016年欧盟"全球战略"中的核心概念。这一概念与印尼在20世纪60年代末提出、东盟在1976年写入《东南亚友好合作条约》的"抗御力"(resilience)属于"同词异译"。"韧性"与"抗御力"之间既有异同,也有联系。其中,对国家实力、区域安全、综合与合作的安全治理这三种基本要素的共同强调是"韧性"成为东盟与欧盟共有概念的关键。这三大要素的凸显又源于东盟和欧盟前后经历的相似的域内外安全形势以及二者在规范与机制层面存在的联系与相互影响。但是,韧性与抗御力之间在规范扩散路径上亦存在显著差异,规范语境、规范设置行为体及规范-机制关系等方面的不同是这种差异的主要成因。
The concept of resilience has been coined as a core idea in the EU common foreign and security policy paper published in 2016,titled“Shared Vision,Common Action:A Stronger Europe”.In fact,it was first put forward by Indonesia in the late 1960s and then incorporated by the ASEAN into the Treaty of Amity and Co-operation in Southeast Asia in 1976.There are both similarities and differences in the usage of this concept by the EU and Southeast Asia.The common concerns about state power,regional security and comprehensive and cooperative security governance by the EU and SA are the key determinant factors behind the great importance that both parties have attached to the concept of resilience,arising from the similar security backgrounds and contexts and the linkages and mutual influences at the institutional and norm levels between the two parties.However,distinguished differences exist as to the usage of this concept by the two parties in the spread of the norms,which can be attributed to the differences in the context,setting-actors and norm-institutional relationships in the two regions.
出处
《欧洲研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期84-102,157,共20页
Chinese Journal of European Studies
基金
江苏省社科基金重点项目"近代以来国际体系的演变与大国关系互动研究"(14LSA002)
南京大学人文基金项目
