期刊文献+

基于多属性群决策的柴油机故障证据融合方法

Evidence fusion method for diesel engine fault based on multi-attribute group decision making
原文传递
导出
摘要 鉴于复杂机械系统中故障信息的不完备及不确定性造成证据理论在故障诊断决策级阶段融合的准确性问题,提出基于多属性群决策的故障证据融合方法.利用多属性群决策的属性分析,计算基于元素属性集合的决策体差异权重,以减小融合证据源的差异;结合柴油机目标故障的相似依赖关系,利用目标故障的可信度权重对冲突焦元信息再分配,旨在提高证据融合的准确性.对R6105AZLD柴油机台架试验结果表明:本文方法可大幅提高诊断准确度和鲁棒性. In view of accuracy of evidence theory in the stage of fault diagnosis decision fusion by incompleteness and uncertainty of fault information in complex mechanical systems,the method of fault evidence fusion based on multi-attribute group decision making was proposed.By using attribute analysis of multi-attribute group decision making,the weight of decision body based on element attribute set was calculated to reduce the difference of fusion evidence sources.Based on the similarity dependence of the target fault of the diesel engine,by using the reliability weight of the target fault,the conflicting focal element was redistributed to improve the accuracy of the evidence fusion.The results of R6105 AZLD diesel engine bench test show that the proposed method can greatly improve diagnostic accuracy and robustness.
作者 王承远 徐久军 严志军 WANG Cheng-yuan;XU Jiu-jun;YAN Zhi-jun(Marine Engineering College,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116026,China)
出处 《大连海事大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期71-78,共8页 Journal of Dalian Maritime University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51509029) 辽宁省教育厅基金资助项目(L2015065) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(3132015032)
关键词 柴油机 故障诊断 多属性群决策 证据融合 可信度权重 冲突焦元 diesel engine fault diagnosis multi-attributegroup decision making evidence fusion the weight of credibility conflict element
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献35

  • 1万洪容,陈怀新.基于多源信息融合的海上目标判证仿真系统[J].电讯技术,2007,47(3):131-135. 被引量:4
  • 2王慧芳.船舶机械检验制度的进展.中国造船工程学会修船技术学术委员会船舶维修理论学组第九次学术会议论文集[M].,1999.. 被引量:3
  • 3YANG B S, KIM K J. Application of dempster-shafer the- ory in fault diagnosis of induction motors using vibration and current signals [ J ]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006 (20) : 403 - 420. 被引量:1
  • 4MOSTAFAEI H R, KHALAJ M, KHALAJ F, et al. En- gine fault diagnosis decision-making with incomplete in- formation using dempster-shafer theory [ J ]. J Basic Appl Sci Res, 2012,2 ( 1 ) : 105 - 113. 被引量:1
  • 5BASIR O, YUAN X. Engine fauh diagnosis based on multi-sensor information fusion using Dempster - Shafer evidence theory [ J ]. Information Fusion, 2007 ( 8 ) :379 - 386. 被引量:1
  • 6WANG H F, WANG J P. Fault diagnosis theory: method and application based on muhisensor data fusion [ J ]. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2000 (28) :513 - 518. 被引量:1
  • 7Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263- 292. 被引量:1
  • 8Levy H, Levy M. Experimental test of the prospect theory value function: A stochastic dominance approach[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2002, 89(2): 1058-1081. 被引量:1
  • 9Marco L, Annamaria S. The Pearson system of utility functions[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2006, 172(2): 560-573. 被引量:1
  • 10Takahashi T. Psychophysics of the probabilit.y weighting function[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2011, 390(5): 902-905. 被引量:1

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部