期刊文献+

多元智能理论视域下新课改中学生评价主体的多元化 被引量:1

The Diversification of Students Evaluation Subjects in New Curriculum Reform from the Perspective of Multiple Intelligence Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着教育改革的深入,课程改革和素质教育的全面推进,必须对教育评价进行全新改革。从理论和实践两方面探析了多元智能理论视域下新课改中学生评价主体多元化的原因,阐述了多元评价主体在学生评价中的作用及如何参与学生评价,并在此基础上提出通过从实际出发充分发挥多元评价主体的智能优势、灵活运用多种评价方法、提升多元评价主体对多元智能理论的理解和运用水平等策略,进一步实现新课改中学生评价主体的多元化的可操作性和评价结果的权威性,使学生乐于接受评价结果,充分发挥评价之导向功能。 With the deepening of education reform,the reform of curriculum and the all-around promotion of quality-oriented education,a new reform of education evaluation must be carried out. This article explores the reasons for the diversification of student evaluation subject in the new curriculum reform from the perspective of multiple intelligence theory from the theoretical and practical aspects. It elaborates the role of diversification of evaluation subject in students evaluation and how to participate the students evaluation. On the basis of this,it put forward some strategies such as full playing of the intelligence superiority of multiple evaluation subjects from the reality,applying flexibly the multiple evaluation methods,improving the understanding and application level of multiple intelligence theory,further realizing the operability of students evaluation subjects diversification and the authority of evaluation results in new curriculum reform,so as to make students happy to accept the evaluation result and full play the guiding function of evaluation.
作者 勾训 GOU Xun(School of Education and Science,Qiannan Normal University of Nationalities,Duyun 558000,China)
出处 《河南科技学院学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第8期21-24,共4页 Journal of Henan Institute of Science and Technology
关键词 多元智能理论 学生评价主体 多元化 multiple intelligence theory student evaluation subject diversification
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

  • 1Alkin, M. C. (1980). Uses and users of evaluation. In E.L. Baker(Eel. ), Evaluating federal education programs. 被引量:1
  • 2Bryk, A. S. (Ed.). (1983). Stakeholder - based evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 17. San Francisco, CA:Jossey- Bass. 被引量:1
  • 3Conway, J. A. (1984). The myth, mystery and mastery of participative decision making in education. Educational Administration Quarterly,20(3), 11-40. 被引量:1
  • 4Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization - focused evaluation( 2ndEd. ). Newbury, CA: Sage. 被引量:1
  • 5Cousins, J.B.&Earl,L.M. (1992).The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14 (4),397-418. 被引量:1
  • 6Fetterman, D. M. ( 1994 ). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1-15. 被引量:1
  • 7Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Empowerment evaluation and the Intemet: A synergistic relationship. Current Issues in Education[ On-line], 1 (4) 被引量:1
  • 8Holdaway, E. A. (1986). Making research matter. Alberta Journal of Education, 32(3) ,249-264. 被引量:1
  • 9Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal,27,363-391. 被引量:1
  • 10Mathisen, W. C. (1990).The Problem solving community :A valuable alternative to disciplinary communizes? Knowledge:Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 11,410 ~ 427. 被引量:1

共引文献89

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部