摘要
实行行为是该当于构成要件的行为,需要个别地判断是否满足具体的构成要件。其意义在于:(1)从罪刑法定原则的角度,限定该当于构成要件的行为的范围;(2)是因果关系的起点行为,属于因果关系的判断对象;(3)应以实行行为阶段的主观面为标准,判断是否存在故意或者过失等主观要件。但是,试图以实行行为概念为核心,统一解决犯罪论诸问题的做法则并不合适,对于未遂犯、共犯论等问题,仍须分别进行实质性探讨。间接正犯的最大问题就在于实行行为性,其成立要件仍然应该是:对于利用行为本身能认定具有作为单独正犯的实行行为性,并且,利用行为的危险被结果予以现实化。
The act of perpetrating accords with constitutive elements,therefore,it is necessary to judge individually whether the act meets specific constitutive elements. The significance of act of perpetrating includes the following points：first,from the perspective of nulla poena sine lege,it is necessary to limit the range of act to meet constitutive elements;Second,it is the entering behavior of causality and object of judgment of causality;third,whether existing subjective elements including intention and negligence should be based on the standard of the subjective aspect of act of perpetrating stage. However,it is inappropriate to resolve all questions of theory of crime uniformly through setting the act of perpetrating as the core. For the question of attempted offense and accomplice,it is necessary to make a substantive discussion respectively. The biggest problem of indirect principal is the character of act of perpetrating. Its constitutive elements should still be that the act of utilizing itself can be affirmed as having the character of act of perpetrating as a solitary principal offender,and the danger of the act of utilizing is realized by consequence.
出处
《苏州大学学报（法学版）》
2018年第2期134-146,共13页
Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition
关键词
实行行为
构成要件该当性
未遂犯
因果关系
间接正犯
Act of Perpetrating
Constitutive Elements
A ttempted Offense
Causality
Indirect Principal
