摘要
领导正直(leader integrity)作为一种道德品质,长期以来被认为是有效领导者的关键特征。近年来,道德丑闻和管理者违法乱纪事件频频发生,引发了学术界对领导正直问题的关注。然而,学术界对领导正直的内涵、测量及其作用机制的研究尚处于起步阶段,关于领导正直的文献综述更是寥寥无几。本文从领导正直的概念、测量、影响因素、作用机制和实施效果等方面,对国内外相关研究进行系统梳理和探讨。未来研究应从领导正直的概念与维度的完善、影响因素的拓展和作用机制的深入识别等方面展开努力。
In recent years, the corporate scandals and management malfeasances in organizations like Enron, Adelphia Communications, World Com, and Tyco International, occurred frequently and have sparked a growing interest about leader integrity. As a frontier topic in the field of leader research, leader integrity has garnered extensive attention from organizational scholars and practitioners. Leader integrity has long been mentioned as a key part of effective leadership. However, studies on leader integrity’s conception, dimension, measurement, mediation and moderation remain incomplete. By systematically clarifying the conception of leader integrity, its dimension, measurement, antecedents and consequences, this study summarizes and evaluates relative research at home and abroad.There are two recent definitions of leader integrity within the organizational literature. First, leader integrity is defined as a general description of moral and ethical behavior, which includes perceived leader integrity and some aspects of ethical leader behavior. Second, leader integrity refers to perception of the consistency between a leader’s words and deeds. However, leader integrity is often associated with or mentioned in conjunction with individual traits such as honesty, fairness, sincerity and trustworthiness. In some cases, integrity has simply been viewed as synonymous with honesty. The basic definition of leader integrity should emphasize moral behavior and consistency between a person’s espoused values and behavior. Future research should further explore the definition of leader integrity and provide a theoretical foundation for leader integrity at home and abroad.In the field of leadership, two instruments have been developed to measure integrity. The first measure of leader integrity is developed by Craig and Gustafson（1998）. The second instrument is Simons, Friedman, Liu and Mc Lean’s（2007） Leadership Behavior Integrity Scale. Both instruments rely upon subordinates’ perceptions of leader behavior. There ma
作者
王婷
杨付
Wang Ting;Yang Fu(School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, 611130)
出处
《心理科学》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第3期706-712,共7页
Journal of Psychological Science
基金
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(71502141)的资助
关键词
道德
领导正直
情境
个体差异
本土文化
moral
leader integrity
context
individual differences
Chinese indigenous culture
