摘要
《行政诉讼法》将规范性文件纳入附带审查范围,有助于对违法的规范性文件及时作出判断和纠正。而作为我国规范性文件附带审查的首例,北京市知识产权法院对商标纠纷案的一审判决,为运用和理解《行政诉讼法》的相应条款提供了很好的佐证,也同时提出了需要进一步探讨的问题,尤其是对规范性文件识别的主体、审查范围、审查程序以及审查后的处理等问题。应当充分运用立法解释或司法解释方式对上述问题进一步明确,以指导司法实践。
The Administrative Procedure Law incorporates normative documents into the scope of the adjunct review, which helps to make timely judgment and correction of normative documents that violate the law. However, as the first case of incidental inspection of normative documents in our country, the judgment by Beijing Intellectual Property Court on the trademark dispute provides good evidence for the application and understanding of the corresponding provisions of the Administrative Procedure Law. And also put forward the is- sues to be further discussed： the subject of normative document identification, the scope of the inspection, the inspection process and the post-inspection process. We should make full use of legislative interpretation or judicial interpretation to further clarify the above issues so as to guide judicial practice.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期90-102,共13页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金
2017年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究部级课题"实证视角下规范性文件一并审查制度研究"(17SFB2013)的阶段性成果之一
清华大学国家治理研究院研究项目支持
关键词
行政规范性文件
附带审查
案例研究
Normative Documents
Incidental Inspection
Case Research
