期刊文献+

社会距离对不公平行为回应的影响 被引量:5

Effect of Social Distance on the Response to Unfair Behaviors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 两个实验在群体层面探讨了奖励和债务领域社会距离(内群体/外群体)对不公平行为回应的影响.实验1采用标准最后通牒游戏范式,发现在奖励领域,个体对内群体成员不公平行为的接受程度比对外群体成员的接受程度更高.实验2使用改编的最后通牒游戏范式,结果表明在债务领域,个体对内群体成员不公平行为的接受程度也比对外群体成员的接受程度更高,且对内群体成员不公平行为的满意度比对外群体更高.该研究表明,即使内群体成员违反公平规则,个体还是会表现出内群体偏好. Two experiments were made in which standard and revised ultimatum game(UG)were used to explore the effect of social distance on the response to unfair behaviors.Experiment one,which adopted the standard UG,used a two-factor within-subject experimental design.The results showed that subjects accepted more unfair distribution plan from in-group members than from out-group members.The fairness of sharing the debt is as important as sharing the reward.So a second experiment was designed to explore the effect of social distance on the response to unfair behaviors in the area of debt.The results showed that people accepted more unfair distribution from in-group members than that from out-groud members;and felt more satis fied to in-ground unfair distribution plan.In sum,our findings showed that the closer the social distance was,the more able people would be to tolerate and satisfy with unfair behaviors.
出处 《西南大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期140-145,共6页 Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(31371055)
关键词 社会距离 内群体 外群体 不公平行为 social distance in-group out-group unfair behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献84

  • 1罗春明,黄希庭.宽恕的心理学研究[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):908-915. 被引量:68
  • 2温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3184
  • 3Berrenberg, J. L., Finalay, K. A, & Stephan, W. G. (2002). Prejudice toward people with cancer or AIDS: Applying the Integrated Threat Model. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 7, 75 - 86 被引量:1
  • 4Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Theno, S. A. (2001). Violating American values: A "value-congruence" approach to understanding outgroup attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 387 - 410. 被引量:1
  • 5Bizman, A., & Yinon, Y. (2001). Intergroup and interpersonal threats as determinants of prejudice: The moderating role of in-group identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 191 - 196. 被引量:1
  • 6Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2002) Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social psychology Bulletin, 28, 744 - 753. 被引量:1
  • 7Branscombe, N. R,, Warm, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641 - 657. 被引量:1
  • 8Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745 - 778. 被引量:1
  • 9Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychology Bulletin, 129, 414 - 116. 被引量:1
  • 10Dovidio, J. F., ten Vergert, M., Stewart, T. L., Gaertner, S. L., Johnson, J. D., & Esses, V. M., et al. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1537 - 1549. 被引量:1

共引文献77

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部