期刊文献+

最后通牒博弈中回应者的情绪唤醒和决策行为研究 被引量:17

Emotional Arousal and Decision-making of Respondents in the Ultimatum Game
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用心理生理实验法,探讨自主神经唤醒对最后通牒博弈中回应者决策行为的影响。结果发现:(1)不公平提议引起被试更大的皮肤电活动变化,表明他们对不公平提议产生更强的情绪反应。(2)情绪唤醒状态可以预示决策行为,被试做出拒绝行为前的皮肤电变化显著大于接受行为前的活动变化。(3)在最后通牒博弈中,博弈双方的性别配对差异影响回应者的决策行为。 The study was designed to investigate the influence of autonomic nervous arousal on the behavioral responses of respondents in the ultimatum game with methods of psycho physiological experiments. The results showed that (1) Higher skin conductance response for unfair offers suggested that unfair offers elicited more emotional arousal. (2)The state of autonomic nervous arousal was a predictor of rejecting unfair offers. Skin conductance activity was significantly higher in response to unfair offeres that were later rejected. (3) Gender pairing of the partners in the ultimatum game systematically affected behavior.
作者 王芹 白学军
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期844-847,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(08jjdxlx266)资助
关键词 最后通牒博弈 决策 情绪 皮肤电活动 the ultimatum game, decision-making, emotion, skin conductance activity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Camerer, C. (1997). Progress in behavioral game theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 167- 188. 被引量:1
  • 2Camerer, C. F. ( 2003 ). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 被引量:1
  • 3Eckel, C. C. , & Grc,ssman, P. J. (2001). Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry, 39, 171 - 188. 被引量:1
  • 4Eckel, C. C. , & Grossman, P. J. (2005). Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In. C. Plott and V. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, New York: North Holland. 被引量:1
  • 5Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367- 388. 被引量:1
  • 6Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowl,s, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E. , Gintis, H. , et al. (2001). In search of homo economics: Experiments in 15 small - scale societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73-79. 被引量:1
  • 7Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286. 被引量:1
  • 8Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 208- 224. 被引量:1
  • 9Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision - making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300, 1755- 1758. 被引量:1
  • 10Solnick, S. J. (2001). Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Economic Inquiry, 39, 189- 200. 被引量:1

同被引文献405

引证文献17

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部