摘要
W中院近五年职务犯罪二审案件出现了证人出庭申请率、同意率、实际出庭率相对较高,但出庭证言采信率及其对案件裁判影响率极低的现象。究其原因在于证人证言是认定职务犯罪的重要证据,而二审惯用的庭前书面证言印证及案外因素顾虑,使证人出庭仅仅成为救济权利的一种程序保障而实际上不影响二审实体裁判。这不仅会引发上诉人及舆论对二审的质疑,也会影响审判资源的合理使用,并有违庭审实质化改革初衷。因而,在二审实践中建立针对性操作机制及落实配套保障机制,应当是一种探寻破解的方向。
Duty crime cases in W cities have appeared the following features：the rate of application for witness,the agreed rate,and the actual trial rate are relatively high,but the rate of testimony in court referee which influences the verdict is extremely low.The reason lies in that the testimony of witnesses is one of the important evidence for duty crime,and the written testimony and other concerns make the witness to appear in court only as a security program which does not affect the second entity.This not only triggers the external queries of appellant and public,but also is the original appeal of the court reform.Therefore,to establish corresponding operating mechanism and implement the security mechanism in practice should be a possible direction to address the issue.
出处
《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期38-47,共10页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
职务犯罪
二审证人出庭
数据呈现
成因分析
Duty crime
Court appearance of witness in criminal appeal trial
Data presentation
Cause analysis
