摘要
相关实证研究表明,认罪认罚案件中被追诉人一审后提起的上诉多为没有实际理据的"空白上诉"。学界普遍认为"空白上诉"损害司法诚信与司法效率,于是提出了"禁止模式""限制模式""突破上诉不加刑模式"等应对策略。但是,着眼于当前司法实践,"空白上诉"主要侵害的法益并非司法诚信与效率,上述应对方案存在值得商榷之处。"空白上诉"系法院基于被追诉人认罪认罚的情况,采纳量刑建议,作出了轻缓判决之后,被追诉人又对刑罚不满提起的上诉。这使得先前基于特殊预防刑减轻作出的轻缓判决出现不公。对此,基于控审分离原则的考量,"空白上诉"造成判决不公正的问题,宜由法律监督机关(检察机关)提起抗诉予以解决,这样才能更好地维护认罪认罚从宽制度的良性运行。
Relevant empirical studies show that most of the appeals filed by the defendant after the first instance in guilty plea cases are blank appeals without actual grounds.The academic circles generally believe that blank appeal damages judicial integrity and judicial efficiency,so coping strategies like prohibition mode,restriction mode,breakthrough appeal without additional punishment mode are put forward.However,the above ideas are worth discussing because blank appeal refers to the appeal filed by the defendant who is dissatisfied with the punishment the court made based on guilty plea,which makes the previous lenient sentence considering the special prevention of punishment alleviation unfair.On the principle that charge should be separate with trial,it is suggested that legal supervision organ in China,that is,the procuratorial organ file a protest to correct the unfair judgment caused by blank appeal so as to maintain the benign operation of guilty plea leniency.
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2021年第6期44-54,共11页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
关键词
认罪认罚从宽
二审
上诉
抗诉
leniency of guilty plea
trial of second instance
appeal
protest
