期刊文献+

高校研究生教育质量问责:理念、标准与主体 被引量:13

Quality Accountability of Postgraduate Education:Ideas,Standards and Subjects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代治理体系下高校研究生教育由行政、学术、市场三类主体共治,责任共担。行政类主体对外适性质量负责,学术类主体对内适性质量负责,市场类主体对个适性质量负责。高校研究生教育外适、内适和个适性三维质量,应由不同主体分别制订质量标准并进行质量问题判定,在三维质量细化基础上进行责任主体界定并进行质量问责。 University postgraduate education under modern management system is jointly governed by administration,academic body and market,and the three sides share the responsibility.The administration is responsible for external adaptability,the academic body for internal adaptability and the market for individual adaptability.This paper proposes that the standards of the quality in the three dimensions of the external,internal and individual adaptabilities in postgraduate education of higher-learning institutions should be formulated by the three sides respectively and the quality should be appraised accordingly.In addition,this paper proposes that the accountability of every side should be defined and the three sides should be held accountable for the quality on the basis of detailed standards of the quality in three dimensions.
作者 梁传杰 邓宸
出处 《研究生教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期6-10,共5页 Journal of Graduate Education
基金 国家社科基金项目(教育学)"专业学位研究生教育质量保障模式研究"(BIA140107)
关键词 现代治理 三维质量 评价主体 责任主体 modern management three-dimension quality subject for appraisal responsible body
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1周光礼.论中国政府与教育中介组织的互动关系:一个法学的视角[J].北京大学教育评论,2006,4(3):140-154. 被引量:19
  • 2胡显章 徐葆耕 等.关于加强人文素质教育的几点认识[J].高等教育研究,1998,(2):29-31. 被引量:4
  • 3张西方.大学功能拓展及其释放机制建立[J].中国高等教育,2007(15):40-42. 被引量:2
  • 4EI-Khawas,Elaine. Accountability and Quality Assurance:New Issues for Academic Inquiry [A]. James J. F. Forest & Philip G. Altbach. International Handbook of Higher Education [ C ]. Dordrecht, Net herland : Springer, 2006. 24. 被引量:1
  • 5Kogan,Maurice. Education Policy [A]. MaryHawkesworth & Maurice Kogan (ed). Encyclopedia of Govern- ment and Pohtics [C]. London and New York:Routledge,2004. 690. 被引量:1
  • 6Clark, Burton R.. The higher education system: academic organization in cross-national perspective [M].Berkeley: University of Califomia Press, 1983.143. 被引量:1
  • 7Burke,Joseph C. and Associates. Achieving accountability in higher education :balancing public,academic,and market demands [M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, 2005.23,23-24,6. 被引量:1
  • 8Becher,Tony & Kogan,Maurice. Process and structure in higher education [M]. London and New York:Routledge, 1992.169-172. 被引量:1
  • 9Middlehurst,Robin. Quality Enhancement for Accountability and Transformation :A Framework for the Future[J]. Tertiary Education and Management, 1997, (3): 15--24. 被引量:1
  • 10Trow,Martin. Trust,markets and accountability in higher education: a comparative perspective [J].Higher Education Policy, 1996, (9) :309-324. 被引量:1

共引文献22

同被引文献108

引证文献13

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部