期刊文献+

新高考选考科目计分方式探讨 被引量:28

The Study about Scoring Methods for Elective Subjects in the College Entrance Examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在新高考综合改革中,高中学业水平考试选考成绩作为高考成绩的组成部分。高考选考科目由于考生能力和题目难易度不同,原始分无法进行比较。如果各科使用标准分或者比例等级计分,虽然解决了题目难易度不同的问题,但因考生能力不同导致的计分不公问题会更加突出。为解决上述问题,提出了计分定级方式,在强假设和弱假设下分别得到选考科目的统计校准分数,然后让学科专家小组在此基础上设定专家校准值。根据选考科目在必考科目有成绩之前还是之后定级,分别给出等级赋分方法,从而解决考生选科时"避难选易"和"避强邻弱"的问题。 When elective subjects are included in the College Entrance Examination, the original scores of different subjects are incomparable because the group ability of candidates and the difficulty of test paper may vary from subject to subject. If we apply the standardized scores or grades with preset percentage to elective subjects, the problem arising from paper difficulty will be solved, but the unfairness due to the different group ability may become more serious. New scoring and grading methods are proposed as follows. First, under a strong hypothesis and a weak hypothesis, the statistically adjusted scores of elective subjects can be obtained respectively. Second, expert adjustment can be set by the subject panel based on the statistically adjusted scores. Last, grade-scoring for elective subjects are different when the grade is given before or after compulsory subjects are scored. A cutting edge of the new scoring methods is that the problem of avoiding the difficult subject and/or the strong candidates group in choosing elective subjects does not arise.
作者 温忠麟 WEN Zhong(School of Psychology, South China Normal Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment lin University, Guangzhou 510631;Authority, Hong Kong, Chin)
出处 《中国考试》 2017年第12期23-29,共7页 journal of China Examinations
关键词 高考 高考改革 高中学业水平考试 学业水平标准 校准分 College Entrance Examination College Entrance Examination Reform Senior High School Proficiency Test Academic Level Standard Adjusted Score
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献47

  • 1郝若平.试论常模参照测验与标准参照测验[J].当代教育科学,1995(Z1):141-142. 被引量:5
  • 2罗莲.告别“标准参照测验”和“常模参照测验”的二元划分[J].中国考试,2007(6):18-22. 被引量:12
  • 3香港考试及评核局.闪亮·新里程[R].2012年年报. 被引量:1
  • 4Brennan, R. L. , ed. Educational measurement (4th edition). Praeger: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. 2006. 被引量:1
  • 5谢小庆.对15种测验等值方法的比较研究[J].心理学报,2000(32):217-222. 被引量:3
  • 6香港考试及评核局.香港中学文凭考试评级程序与水平参照成绩汇报[R].2011. 被引量:1
  • 7Marsh, H. , W. , & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big- Fish - -Little -Pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross - cultural (26 - country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psy- chologist, 58, 364- 376. 被引量:1
  • 8Ludtke, O., KoHer, O., Marsh, H.W., & Trautwein, U. (2005). Teacher frame of reference and the big - fish - little - pond effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30,263 - 285. 被引量:1
  • 9香港考试及评核局.香港中学文凭考试香港校本评核分数调整机制[R].2011. 被引量:1
  • 10广东省考试中心.广东高考年报[M]广东高等教育出版社,2004. 被引量:1

共引文献70

同被引文献139

引证文献28

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部