摘要
目的评价丙型肝炎病毒核心抗原(HCV-cAg)、丙型肝炎病毒抗体(HCV-IgG)及丙型肝炎病毒RNA(HCV-RNA)3种检测方法在丙型肝炎实验室诊断中的意义。方法收集84例丙型肝炎疑似患者和87例健康对照者血清,采用ELISA法检测HCV-cAg和HCV-IgG,实时荧光定量聚合酶链式反应法(RT-PCR)检测HCV-RNA。结果 84例丙型肝炎疑似患者中HCVIgG阳性率为84.5%,HCV-cAg阳性率为13.1%,HCV-RNA阳性率为52.4%;71例HCV-IgG阳性患者中HCV-RNA阴性35例,假阳性率为49.3%,11例HCV-cAg阳性患者中HCV-RNA阴性5例,假阳性率为45.5%;44例HCV-RNA阳性的丙型肝炎确诊患者中HCV-IgG假阴性率为18.2%,HCV-cAg假阴性率为86.4%;HCV-cAg和HCV-IgG联合检测的假阴性率为13.6%,真阳性率为100.0%。结论 HCV-cAg和HCV-IgG在丙型肝炎的实验室诊断中均存在一定的假阴性和假阳性,将二者联合检测或在必要时与HCV-RNA三者联合检测可降低漏诊率。
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of hepatitis C virus core antigen（HCV-cAg）,hepatitis C virus（HCVIgG）and hepatitis C virus（HCV-RNA）in the laboratory diagnosis of Hepatitis C.Methods HCV-cAg and HCV-IgG were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay（ELISA）,HCV-RNA was detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction（RT-PCR）in 84 suspected HCV patients and 87 healthy control subjects.Results In 84 suspected HCV patients,the HCV-IgG positive rate was 84.5%,HCV-cAg positive rate was 13.1%,HCV-RNA positive rate was 52.4%.Among 71 cases of HCV-IgG positive patients,there were 35 cases with negative HCV-RNA,the false positive rate was 49.3%.In 11 cases of HCVcAg positive patients,there were 5cases with negative HCV-RNA,the false positive rate was 45.5%.In 44 cases of HCV-RNA positive diagnosis of hepatitis C patients,HCV-IgG false negative rate was 18.2%,HCV-cAg false negative rate was 86.4%.The false negative rate of combined detection of HCV-cAg and HCV-IgG was 13.6%,and the true positive rate was 100.0%.Conclusion HCV-cAg and HCV-IgG have certain false negative and false positive in laboratory diagnosis of HCV,combine these two methods,or joint with HCV-RNA detection,could reduce the rate of missed diagnosis.
出处
《国际检验医学杂志》
CAS
2017年第14期1890-1891,1894,共3页
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金
广州市医药卫生科技项目(20171A011298)
