摘要
普世意义的程序安定性必然有与特定适用范围相对应的"相对度",而决定"相对度"的标准在于一国现有的法治环境和法治思维。决定我国当前对民事诉讼程序价值的保障力度与限度的法外因素是多元化的,应在充分认识现实国情的基础上,通过技术性调整,提升对程序性错误进行证明、认定、宣告与救济的力度,限制程序的循环进行、意思自治权的宽泛赋予和柔性程序制度的构建,同时对人为主观意识主导下技术调整无力的瓶颈问题持客观的认识态度并积极采取预防措施。
The universal significance of procedural stability must have a ＂relative degree＂ corresponding to the specific scope of application, and the ＂relative degree＂ is determined by the existing legal environment and the rule of law. The external factors that determine the strength and limitation of the value of civil procedure in our country are diversified. We should take three positive measures based on fully understanding the actual situation through technical adjustment. The first is to improve the procedural error proof, identification, announcement and relief efforts. The second is to construct procedure of limitation of circulation, autonomy and flexibility to the broad procedure system. The third is to take an objective attitude to the technical adjustment bottleneck problems and actively preventive measures.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第7期123-132,共10页
Law Science Magazine
基金
中国政法大学"刑民交叉案件程序问题研究"青年教师学术创新团队资助
为2014年国家社科基金青年项目"迈向制度理性的民事程序研究"(项目编号:14CFX028)
2015年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目中青年课题"对民事违法审判行为的检察监督"(项目编号:15SFB3020)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
程序价值的准确性
司法环境
程序效益的实在化
保障不足与过度
accuracy of the civil procedure value
judicial environment
effectiveness of civil procedure value
inadequate protection and excessive
