摘要
在中央推动的新一轮城市社区居委会减负行动的背景下,居委会"去行政化"再次引起学界热议。城市社区居委会"去行政化"的隐含逻辑是依据法律定位追求组织纯度,结果导致居委会"去行政化"的理论逻辑与居委会实然状态间出现冲突。从需求溢出理论的视角看,血亲组织、营利组织、非营利组织、政权组织这四大类广义社会组织之间存在着渐变过渡与功能嵌入,基本不存在百分之百纯度的组织,因此追求组织纯度的组织理论本身就是错误的。因此,城市社区居委会的出路与定位应该是基层治理主体的功能资源优配,而不该是"去行政化"。同时,基于我国城市社区居委会目前普遍不堪重负的现实,给城市社区居委会减负势在必行,但给居委会减负的逻辑不应是"去行政化",而是优配它的功能资源。为此,应该考虑这样一条按照价值排序进行倒序切割的减负思路,即把居委会目前的功能和事务进行价值排序,然后根据其资源禀赋和承载能力进行倒序切割,从而把超出其承载能力且价值排序靠后的功能事务切割掉。
Under the background of burden reduction action of community residents＇ committees pushed by the Central Government, de-administration has once again given rise to heated debates in the academic circle. The mainstream ＂de-ad- ministration＂ logic of community residents＇ committee pursues organization purity according to legal position, which would inevitably cause the ＂paradox＂ between the mainstream ＂de-administration＂ logic of residents＇ committee and the actual sta- tus of administration in governance practice. According to the Demand Spillover Theory, consanguinity organization, profit organization, non-profit organization and political power organization can solve people＇s demand spillover problems, while gradual transition and functional embedment exists among these four basic functional methods. That is to say, there is basi- cally no social organization type with absolute purity. Based on this, the outlet and orientation of community residents＇ com- mittee should be optimal allocation of resources rather than de-administration. Meanwhile, facing the reality of community residents＇ committees that are currently overtaxed in China, it is imperative to reduce the heavy burdens of community residents＇ committees. However, the logic of reducing the heavy burdens is not de-administration, but the optimal allocation of functions and resources. Therefore, we put forward the following proposal according to value sorting and cutting on the contrary. That is, we can currently sort out the functions and values of residents＇ committees, and then cut on the contrary according to the functions and resources. It follows that the functions and affairs beyond the capacities of residents＇ commit- tees can be cut off on the contrary.
出处
《北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期118-125,共8页
Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金
中国人民大学"统筹支持一流大学和一流学科建设"项目
关键词
城市社区
居委会
去行政化
需求溢出理论
资源优配
urban community
residents＇ committeel de-administration
demand spillover theory
optimal allocation of resource
