摘要
20世纪80年代初,美国关于"福利依赖"问题的讨论成为舆论关注的焦点,逐步形成了依赖文化理论、制度危机理论和后工业社会新风险理论三种理论解释。近年来,在我国低保制度中,同样出现了关于"福利依赖"问题的讨论。通过对比美国"福利依赖者"与我国城市低保中处于劳动年龄、具有劳动能力的受助者,发现两者在福利动态和工作逻辑方面皆不相同,为此本文提出了"非典型福利依赖"新概念,并引入生命历程视角,建立了"非典型福利依赖"新的解释框架及其政策建议。
In the early 1980＇ s, the controversy of welfare dependency in American social assistance system gain attention from the public. Three theories named dependency culture, institutional crisis and new risks in post-lndustrial society formed to explain the welfare dependency phenomenon. Nowadays, the debate of welfare dependency welfare dynamic and has risen in the Minimum Subsistence work logic between the recipients from Guarantee System as well. Through comparing U.S. and China, this paper finds that Chinese working age recipients with working ability are different from the American recipients and their behavior of receiving social assistance could be called the atypical welfare dependency. This paper applies the life course theory and tries to create a new theory model to give relevant social policy reform suggestions.
出处
《社会政策研究》
2017年第2期3-13,共11页
Social Policy Research
基金
国家社科基金重大项目:社会服务管理体制改革与社会管理创新(12&ZD063)资助
关键词
非典型福利依赖
低保制度
福利依赖
生命历程
Atypical welfare dependency, The Minimum Subsistence Guarantee System, Welfaredependency,Li~ course
