摘要
目的:研究对比即刻种植、延期种植、植骨后延期种植三种方式对骨缺损患者的疗效影响。方法:选取从2013年5月至2014年7月,于我院接受治疗的骨缺损患者123例,以数字法随机分为A组、B组以及C组各41例。其中A组患者给予即刻种植,B组患者行延期种植,C组患者则进行植骨后延期种植,对三组患者均进行随访,对比治疗效果。结果:三组患者不同时间点ISQ评分对比均无显著差异(P>0.05);三组患者感染发生率以及疼痛发生率对比均不明显(P>0.05);三组美观满意度、舒适满意度对比均不明显(P>0.05);三组治疗1年后、2年后总有效率对比均不明显(均P>0.05)。结论:即刻种植、延期种植、植骨后延期种植三种方式治疗骨缺损均有显著疗效,临床治疗中可根据患者具体情况选取合理的种植以及植骨方式。
Objective： To study the contrast plant, extension, immediately after the bone graft delayed planting three ways affect the curative effect of patients with bone defect. Methods： From May 2013 to July 2014, 123 cases in our hospital for treatment of bone defect patients, with digital method were randomly divided into group A and group B and C group each had 41 cases. In which A group of patients at planting, group B patients delayed planting, group C patients with delayed planting after bone graft. For three groups of patients were followed up, compared the treatment effect. Results： The three groups of patients with different time points ISQ score comparison had no significant difference（P〉0.05）. Three groups of patients with infection rate and incidence of pain contrast was not obvious（P〉0.05）. Satisfaction was beautiful, comfortable satisfaction compared three group were not obvious（P〉0.05）. Three groups at 1 year, 2 years after total effective contrast was not obvious（P〉0.05）. Conclusion： Immediate,extension after planting, bone graft extension grow three ways to treat bone defect has significant curative effect, clinical treatment can be selected on the basis of the condition of the patients in the reasonable way of planting and bone graft.
出处
《中国口腔种植学杂志》
2017年第1期13-15,39,共4页
Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology
关键词
即刻种植
延期种植
植骨
疗效
骨缺损
instantly grow
delayed planting
bone graft
curative effect
bone defect
