期刊文献+

羁押必要性审查法律适用之实证分析——以S直辖市F区检察院三年实践为样本 被引量:5

An Empirical Analysis on Law Application in Detention Necessity Review System——Taking the Three Year Practice of F District Procuratorate of S Municipality as a Sample
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自2012年《刑事诉讼法》为检察机关增设捕后羁押必要性审查职能以来,其理论价值不言自明,实践表现则有待考察。因羁押必要性审查工作突出而被评为全国检察机关"示范检察室"的检察院,其审查工作经历了萌芽期、发展期,现已进入稳定期。被建议变更强制措施的犯罪嫌疑人户籍、罪名分布、相关部门的态度等方面具有鲜明特点,但在法律适用层面却表现得日趋保守:能被判处缓刑成为变更强制措施的前提条件、存在前科劣迹基本排斥了变更强制措施可能、共同犯罪中集体共命运现象明显,案件被局限于事实清楚、不存争议的现象明显,附条件申请变更基本被驳回,量化评估适用具有明显局限。羁押必要性审查要发挥其独立价值,需要进一步更新司法观念,破除现有习惯思维,另立新理念。 There is an urgent need to inspect how detention necessity review power practiced ever since new criminal procedure law entrusted it to the procuratorial organs,although its theory value is obvious.We selected a sample of the prosecutor's office due to its outstanding performance on the detention necessity review work,which has been evaluated as the national model prosecutor's office. Its review word has experienced the embryonic period,development period,and now has entered a stable period.There are many distinctive features on following aspects,the residence and criminal charges of suspects who were proposed to change the mandatory measures,the attitude of the relevant departments.But the performance of prosecutor's office in the application of the law tends to be conservative.Whether the suspect can be sentenced to probation has become a prerequisite for changing the mandatory measures.If the suspects have criminal record or other delinquency history,he or she will not be bailed.The suspects' fates were collectively considered in joint crime cases. Only the facts are clearly checked,can suspects be bailed.If the suspect attaches some conditions,his or her apply for change will not be permitted.The quantitative evaluation has obvious limitations for this kind of word. All in all,if we want to show detention necessity review's independent value,we need to further update our judicial concept,get rid of the existing habits and create some innovative views.
作者 樊华中 Fan Huazhong(Litigation Supervision Bureau, Fengxian People' s Procuratorate of Shanghai, Shanghai 201499)
出处 《河南财经政法大学学报》 2017年第2期80-90,共11页 Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金 2015年度国家社会科学基金"认罪认罚从宽实施程序研究"的阶段性成果(项目编号:15BFX072)
关键词 羁押必要性 法律适用 逮捕 实证 detention necessity law application arrest empirical evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献76

共引文献92

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部