摘要
"泰州天价环境公益诉讼案"作为一起典型的环境公益诉讼案例,虽然一定程度上存在"能动司法"之嫌,但从环境公益诉讼和环境侵权的视角看,该案在新《环境保护法》及《环境民事公益诉讼解释》尚未实行之时,通过积极释法为社会组织参与环境公益诉讼在提供了主体资格认定上的支持,发挥了环境执法司法联动机制在环境公益诉讼中的作用,对环境侵权的因果关系认定和举证责任分配合理,对环境侵权责任数额的认定及责任的执行方式方面具有创新性。同时该案也提供了很好的制度启示,即必须建立环境公益专项基金,完善环境损害评估机制,才能更有效地发挥环境公益诉讼的环境保护功能。
Although the ＂Taizhou Case＂,a typical environmental public interest litigation lawsuit,looks like an active judiciary,it is also,from the perspective of environmental public interest litigation and environmental torts,a kind of support to the subject standing of social organizations in their participation into such cases through more progressive way of interpretation of law before the formal introduction of the new Environmental Protection Law as well as Interpretations to Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigations.Coordinated law enforcement mechanism plays an important role in the case.Cause-effect affirmation and rational distribution responsibility of the evidence are reasonable.ascertainment of compensation amount and enforcement of liabilities are innovative.Moreover,the case brought about institutional revelations,such as the necessity of establishment of specialized environmental public interest litigation fund and optimizing the evaluation for environmental damages to give full play to the function of protection of the environmental public interest litigations.
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2016年第5期21-27,共7页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
关键词
环境公益诉讼
环境侵权
环境损害赔偿
环境修复
Environmental Public Interest Litigation
Environmental Tort
Compensation for Environmental Damage
Environmental Rehabilitation
