摘要
由于缺少有关环境公益诉讼时效和起诉期限的明确规定,理论界在此问题上观点林立,而实践中各地法院对此问题处理不一。环境公益诉讼与环境私益诉讼在诉讼目的、起诉主体以及诉权基础等方面存在明显不同,现行有关环境私益诉讼时效与起诉期限的规定难以适用于环境公益诉讼。为此,应根据我国环境公益诉讼诉权基础及其样态制定出切合环境公益诉讼实际需求的起诉期限制度。根据起诉者本身的权利与义务承担情形,并对相关的价值进行综合衡量的基础上,社会组织提起的环境民事公益诉讼应不受起诉期限限制,而检察机关提起的无论是环境民事公益诉讼还是环境行政公益诉讼都应受到普通和最长起诉期限限制。
Due to lack of clear and concrete provisions on limitation and prosecution period of environmental public interest litigation,the theoretical circles have a wide range of views on this issue,and in practice,local courts have dealt with it quite differently.There are tremendous differences between environmental public interest and private interest litigations,therefore the current rules on limitation and prosecution periods of environmental private interest litigation are not well applied to environmental public interest litigation.To this end,based on the standing foundation as well as the nature of environmental public interest litigation types in China,a system of limitation and prosecution period that meets the actual needs of environmental public interest litigation should be developed.According to the rights(powers)and obligations(duties)of the suitor itself,and based on the comprehensive measurement of the relevant values,the environmental civil public interest litigation initiated by the social organizations shall be subject to nolimitations,and whichever the environmental public interest litigation or environmental administrative public interest litigation initiated by the procuratorial organs should be subject to the normal and longest prosecution periods.
作者
李庆保
LI Qingbao(China University of Political Science and Law;North China Electric Power University)
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2020年第2期29-38,206,共11页
Journal Of CUPL
