摘要
行政判断余地作为行政机关最终决定权的一种,在德国理论与实务界已经广获认可。行政判断余地理论仍处于发展状态,其认定标准已经从单一标准走向综合标准,相关的司法判决也不断作出调整,在行政功能发挥、权利保护、法院监控能力等方面找寻平衡点。从德国联邦行政法院、宪法法院的判决入手,分析司法机关对于行政判断余地的审查范围、认定标准、审查密度,斟酌既已成型的认定标准类推扩展适用的可行性,从而研读其类型化所面临的瓶颈,判断行政判断余地的未来发展趋势,以期对我国相关领域的司法实务操作提供一种参考。
As a final decision the administrative room of judgement is widely recognized not only in the academic but also in the practical circles. Seeing that the actual world becomes more and more complicated, for one thing, the administration needs a free space to improve its flexibility of reaction, for another, the means of judicial relief should be in place as well, in case a Vacuum of control comes up. The theory of administrative room of judgement is still in a process of development, the criteria of its recognization are going from single standard towards comprehensive standards. Relevant judicial decisions keep on changing, in order to find the best balance point among the administration efficiency, rights protection and the supervisory ability of the court. Through the analysis of the decisions of the Federal Administrative Court and the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, this article demonstrates the scope of judicial control, recognization standards, judicial review density of the administrative Room of Judgement, analyses the difficulties that its categorization is facing, and judges its development trend, so that a reference can be provided for the judicial practice in China.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期131-144,共14页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
判断余地
不确定概念
基本权利
审查密度
类型化
Room of Judgement
Uncertain Legal Concept
Fundamental Rights
Review Density
Categorization
