摘要
行政法上存在着大量不确定性的法律概念。确定这些概念的具体内涵和外延,是将一般性法适用于具体案件的前提。行政机关主要运用原则补充、定量方法和专家意见等来填补不确定性法律概念。不确定性法律概念的具体化应当受到行政司法裁判的完全审查,这一观点在逻辑上存在诸多谬误。原则的抽象性和一般性决定了法院在对通过原则补充方法填补不确定法律概念进行司法审查时,应采取一种较低的审查密度。由于学科背景和专业分工的差异,法院往往会对行政机关使用定量方法所确定的概念内涵和外延给予尊重,对其进行非常有限的司法审查。专家意见的特殊性致使法院对行政机关的这种不确定性法律概念的具体化行为采取一种相对谨慎的审查态度。
There are lots of uncertain legal concepts in administrative law. The determination of specif- ic connotation and denotation of these uncertain legal concepts is a prerequisite for applying the general law to specific cases. The executive authority mainly uses supplement by principles, quantitative methods and expert opinions to fill up the uncertain legal concepts. The view that the concretization of the uncertain legal concepts should be subject to a complete administrative judicial review has many mistakes in logics. The ab- stractness and generality of the principle decide that the court should adopt a lower density for review when conducting the judicial review of filling up the uncertain legal concepts through the method of supplement by principles. Due to the differences in the academic background and professional division, the court generally respects the connotation and denotation of the uncertain legal concepts determined by executive authority through quantitative methods and conduct limited judicial review on them. The special nature of the expert opinions leads the court to adopt a relatively prudent attitude towards the review of the executive authority＇ s concretization of uncertain legal concepts.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期111-121,共11页
Political Science and Law
基金
山东大学青年学者未来计划专项资金资助
关键词
不确定性法律概念
司法审查
“唯一正解”
判断余地
Uncertain Legal Concepts
Judicial Review
＂The Only Right Answer＂
the Space for Judgment
