期刊文献+

基于静态冲击的WorldSID与ES-2假人特性对比研究 被引量:3

A Comparative Study of Performance Between World SID and ES-2 Based on Static Impact
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于新的侧面碰撞假人World SID与ES-2假人结构上的不同,为进一步研究两种假人在性能上的差异,采用静态冲击的方法对两种假人的肩部、胸部、腹部及盆骨的响应特性进行了对比分析。结果表明,World SID假人整体上的刚度比ES-2假人的刚度低。主要体现在当假人在y向承受相同的冲击时,World SID假人受力更低,加速度更低,肋骨位移更大。在承受45°斜角冲击时,World SID假人的胸部肋骨与ES-2假人胸部肋骨表现出明显不同的特性,该工况下World SID假人肋骨位移比ES-2假人的肋骨位移小。 Based on the structure differences between a new side impact dummy of WorldSID and ES-2, in order to further study the difference in performance between WorldSID and ES-2,the responses of the shoulder, thorax, abdomen and pelvis to static impact loading were compared for both dummies. The results show that the stiffness of the WorldSID dummy is lower than that of ES-2. Under the y-directional impact, the WorldSID exhibited lower force, lower acceleration and larger rib deflection. Under the 45° oblique impact, the rib deflection of the WorldSID dummy is lower than that of the ES-2 dummy.
出处 《汽车工程学报》 2016年第6期460-465,468,共7页 Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering
关键词 侧面碰撞 WorldSID ES-2 静态冲击 side impact WorldSID ES-2 static impact
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1曹立波,王鹏,杜文建,胡敏锋.基于乘员损伤分析的轿车侧面碰撞安全性研究[J].北京汽车,2007(3):17-21. 被引量:6
  • 2TYLKOI. S,GERMANL A,DALMOTAS D,et al. Improving side impact rotection: response of the ES-2RE and worldsid in a proposed harmonized pole test[C] // The 2006 IRCOBI Con ference. Madrid:International Research Council on the Biome- chanies of Injury , 2006 : 213- 224. 被引量:1
  • 3NHTS A. The new car assessment program suggested approa -ches for future program enhancements[R]. Washington:Na- tional Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 4EURO-NCAP. Euro NCAP pole side impact testing protocol version4. 1[M]. Belgium: European New Car Assessment Pro- gramme, 2004:1- 11. 被引量:1
  • 5WINKELBAUER D, MILLER P M, KALETO H A, FM- VSS214 dynamic nprm-an overview of the new procedure, component level development tests and vehicle design changes [R]. Detroit:SAE Paper,No. 2005-01-0742. 被引量:1
  • 6NCAC. FE model of dodge neon report of test No. 2320[R]. Washington: NHSTA National Crash Analysis Center, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 7MADYMO R6.2. 1. Applications side impact application ver- sion 1.0[M]. Shanghai: TNO Automotive China, 2005: 91- 101. 被引量:1
  • 8MALKUSSON R,KARLSSON P. Simulation method for es- tablishing and satisfying side impact design requirements[R]. Detroit:SAE Paper, No. 982358. 被引量:1
  • 9IIH S. Side impact test program rating guidelines[M]. Arling- ton: Insurance Institute For Highway Safety, 2006:1-20. 被引量:1
  • 10WATANABE K, TACHHIBANA M. Vehicle side structure concept using ultra high strength steel and rollforming technol- ogy[R]. Detroit : SAE Paper, No. 2006- 01- 1403. 被引量:1

共引文献27

同被引文献6

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部