期刊文献+

诚实的奖励:员工自我效能感、差错承认与绩效评估关系探究 被引量:6

The Reward of Being Honest: An Exploration of Employees' Self-Effi cacy, Error Admission and Leaders' Evaluation of Employees' Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 犯错在组织中并不少见。但基于建立良好形象的动机,员工很少会主动承认差错。基于自我认知和信息加工理论,提出员工积极自我认知会促进差错承认,同时差错承认会向上级传递信号影响其对员工的绩效评估。通过对675名员工及其配对上级两阶段的调研,使用三明治分析方法,发现员工自我效能感正向影响差错承认;差错承认对上级评价员工任务绩效无显著影响,但会显著降低上级对员工反生产行为的评估,由此说明了差错承认的奖励。 Making errors is not rare in organizations, especially under the increasing fierce competition and high pressure to accurately finish tasks in short order. Yet in order to leave good impression to their supervisors, employees are less likely to admit their errors. Based on the self-cognition theory, it proposed that those with high confidence tend to admit errors. Moreover, it applied the information-processing theory to explore whether employees' admitting errors would have detrimental effect on leaders' evaluation. Overall, this study developed a model integrating the antecedent as employees' self-efficacy and the outcomes as leaders' evaluation of employees' task performance and counterproductive behaviors. To examine the causal effect, this study collected data in 2 waves. In time 1, it collected employees' demographic variables and employees' self- efficacy; in time 2, it collected employees' error admitting behaviors. Also, in time 2, immediate supervisors were asked to evaluate subordinates' task performance and counterproductive behaviors. In time 1, it gained 761 samples; in time 2, 675 employees and their immediate supervisors responded to the questionnaire. In the samplel the leader needs to evaluate 11 employees. To rule out the nesting effect of leaders in evaluating employees' performance, this study adopted the sandwiches estimator from Liu et al.'s (2015) study and used Mplus 6.0 soRware to do the analysis. Results revealed that 1) employees' self-efficacy had positive impact on error admitting =. 10,p 〈 .05); 2) error admitting had non-significant impact on leaders' evaluation of employees' task performance (B = .08,p 〉 .05), but negatively influenced leaders' evaluation of employees' counterproductive behaviors ~ = -.19, p 〈 .05). Results showed that error admitting was not that detrimental to leaders' evaluation of employees' performance; in fact, admitting errors could help to reduce leaders' evaluation of individuals' deviant be
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期1448-1453,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71132003)和国家自然科学基金面上项目(71672114)的资助
关键词 差错承认 自我效能感 任务绩效 反生产行为 三明治分析方法 error admission self-efficacy, task performance, counterproductive behavior, sandwiches estimator
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献79

  • 1余嘉元.决策风格和风险偏好的关系[J].统计与决策,2001,17(11):20-20. 被引量:5
  • 2梁竹苑,许燕,蒋奖.决策中个体差异研究现状述评[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):689-694. 被引量:26
  • 3卞华舵.关于不确定性情境下决策风格研究的综述[J].南京社会科学,2007(9):58-62. 被引量:2
  • 4陈社育,余嘉元.(2000).领导决策风格量表的修订与应用研究.南京师大学报(社会科学飯),(4),89-93. 被引量:1
  • 5江雯.(2006).职业选择态度、效能和袂策风格对职业决策效果的影响.硕士学位论文,北京师范大学. 被引量:1
  • 6梁竹苑.(2006).决策风格情境性特征的实验研究.博士学位论文,北京师范大学. 被引量:1
  • 7Andersen, J. A. (2000). Intuition in managers: Are intuitivemanagers more effective. Journal of ManagerialPsychology, 75(1), 46-63. 被引量:1
  • 8Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing:Forms of decision avoidance result from reason andemotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 139-167. 被引量:1
  • 9Andersson, P., & Engelberg, E. (2006). Affective andrational consumer choice modes: The role of intuition,analytical decision-making, and attitudes to money.SSE/EFI Working Paper in Business Administration No2006:013. Retrieved October 15, 2012 fromhttp://swoba.hhs.se/hastba/papers/hastba2006_013.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 10Appelt,K. C., Milch, K. F.,Handgraaf, M. J. J., & Weber, E.U. (2011). The Decision Making Individual DifferencesInventory and guidelines for the study of individualdifferences in judgment and decision-making research.Judgment and Decision Making, 6(3), 252-262. 被引量:1

共引文献18

同被引文献35

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部