期刊文献+

决策风格的理论发展及建构:基于信息加工视角 被引量:19

Theoretical Construction of Decision-Making Styles: An Information-Processing Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 决策风格是人们在决策中表现出来的习惯性或独特的行为模式,对决策、管理等领域均有重要影响。近年兴起的决策风格理论主要基于个体信息加工策略,如基于双加工理论和基于后悔情绪的决策风格模型等。决策风格对个体决策的影响表现在决策策略与偏差、情绪和无意识加工等方面。该领域在诸如决策风格的主要理论、测量工具和理论检验等方面亦取得积极进展,未来研究方向应注意基于双加工理论和进化心理学建构决策风格理论。 Decision-making style (DMS) is the learned habitual response pattern exhibited by an individual confronted with a situation requiring a decision. DMS is an important concept in empirical literature on decision making, management, consumer behavior, counseling, and vocation behavior. The recently developed DMS models were based on information processing strategies, such as dual-processing theory and regret theory, and focused on the effects of decision strategies, biases, emotions, and unconscious processing on decision making. The DMS field has also made significant progress in theoretical constructions, such as definitions, measurements, and theoretical examinations. Future research should integrate DMSs and behavioral decision-making theories, such as dual-processing theory, and construct DMS models from the perspective of evolutionary psychology.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期112-121,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2011CB711000) 国家自然科学基金项目(70701036 71071150) 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KSCX2-EW-J-8)
关键词 决策风格 认知风格 行为决策 个体差异 decision making style cognitive style behavioral decision making individual differences
  • 相关文献

参考文献79

二级参考文献92

  • 1张雨青,陈仲庚.感觉寻求量表对我国被试的测定及因素分析[J].心理科学通讯,1990,13(4):3-8. 被引量:25
  • 2张结海.短期后悔和长期后悔的差异,三种不同的解释[J].心理学动态,2000,8(4):63-68. 被引量:2
  • 3Lauriola M, Levin I P. Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: an exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001, 31:215-226 被引量:1
  • 4Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econornetrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-292 被引量:1
  • 5Soane E, Chmiel N. Are risk preferences consistent? The influence of decision domain and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005, 38:1781-1791 被引量:1
  • 6Moore S R, Smith R E, Gonzalez R. Personality and judgment heuristics: contextual and individual difference interactions in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997, 23(1): 76-83 被引量:1
  • 7Kowert P A, Hermann M Co. Who takes risks? Daring and caution in foreign policy making. Journal of conflict Resolution, 1997, 41(5): 611-637 被引量:1
  • 8Nicholson N, Soane E, Fenton-O'Creevy M, et al. Domain specific risk taking and personality. Journal of Risk Research, 2005, 8(2): 157-176 被引量:1
  • 9Levin I P, Gaeth G J, Schreiber J, et al. A new look at framing effects: distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2002, 88(1): 411-429 被引量:1
  • 10Levin I P, Schneider S L, Gaeth G J. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 76(2): 149-188 被引量:1

共引文献50

同被引文献174

引证文献19

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部