期刊文献+

早期乳腺癌无创腋窝淋巴结分期的临床初步观察 被引量:10

Noninvasive axillary lymph node staging for early-stage breast cancer by ultrasound examination: a preliminary clinical study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声检查评估乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移状态的临床应用价值。方法入组军事医学科学院附属医院2013年12月至2015年9月期间连续收治的282例新发Tis-T2期乳腺癌患者,指定2名高年资超声医师行腋窝超声检查,根据淋巴结声像学参数,将患者分为转移组、未转移组或可疑组。腋窝淋巴结分期以病理学结果作为金标准,分析超声检查评估乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的准确性,比较各组腋窝淋巴结转移负荷;单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析各个声像学参数对判断腋窝淋巴结转移状态的预测价值。结果超声判断腋窝淋巴结转移组+未转移组的灵敏度、特异度、阳性及阴性预测值、准确度分别为85.6%、87.1%、86.4%、86.3%和86.3%,Kappa值为0.727(P<0.001)。在病理证实腋窝淋巴结转移患者中,超声判断未转移组的平均淋巴结转移负荷明显低于超声转移组(1.2/6.9枚,P<0.001),超声判断为未转移而病理结果证实为转移的患者共16例,其中14例患者腋窝淋巴结转移负荷仅为1枚,其余2例患者分别为2枚和3枚。单因素Logistic回归分析显示,最大皮质厚度预测腋窝淋巴结转移诊断效能最佳(ROC曲线下面积为0.872);多因素Logistic回归分析显示,最大皮质厚度、髓质与皮质厚度比值与腋窝淋巴结转移相关(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归模型ROC曲线下面积为0.879,灵敏度及特异度分别为77.0%和85.1%。结论超声检查评估腋窝淋巴结转移具有较高的准确性;超声判断假阴性的患者腋窝淋巴结转移负荷较低。最大皮质厚度是判断腋窝淋巴结转移最主要的声像学参数。在早期乳腺癌患者中,超声检查无创评估可能是潜在的替代前哨淋巴结活检行腋窝淋巴结分期的手段。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of axillary ultrasound (AUS)in the identification of axillary nodal metastasis (ALNM).Methods Two hundred and eighty-two consecutive patients with stage Tis-T2 breast cancer were prospectively enrolled between December 2013 and September 2015.All the patients underwent AUS performed by two specified senior ultrasound doctors.Sonographic features of their axillary lymph nodes (longitudinal and transverse diameters,cortical and hilar thickness,blood flow form)were collected.These patients were divided into metastatic, suspicious and non-metastatic groups based on the ultrasound features by ultrasound doctors.The diagnostic accuracy of AUS was compared with results of pathology.Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between sonographic features and ALNM.The area under the ROC curve was used to assess the accuracy of the multivariate Logistic regression model.Results The sensitivity,specificity,positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of AUS were respectively 85.6%,87.1%,86.4%,86.3%,and 86.3% in the metastatic and non-metastatic groups.The Kappa value was 0.727(P 〈0.001).The ALNM burden in the non-metastatic group was significantly lower than in the metastatic group (1.2 vs 6.9,P 〈0.001).The false-negative results were found only in 16 cases,fourteen of whom had only 1,and two had 2 and 3 ALNM,respectively.Univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that maximum cortical thickness was the most significant predictive factor of ALNM(the area under the ROC curve was 0.872).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis suggested that cortical thickness and the ratio of hilar thickness to cortical thickness were predictive factors of ALNM(P 〈0.05).The area under the ROC curve of the multivariate Logistic regression model was 0.879 and its sensitivity and specificity were 77.0% and 85.1%,respectively.Conclusion AUS is a valuable tool for detecting ALNM.Patients with false-negative
出处 《军事医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期759-763,776,共6页 Military Medical Sciences
关键词 乳腺癌 超声检查 腋窝淋巴结 breast cancer ultrasound axillary lymph node
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1陈万青,郑荣寿,张思维,曾红梅,左婷婷,贾漫漫,夏昌发,邹小农,赫捷.2012年中国恶性肿瘤发病和死亡分析[J].中国肿瘤,2016,25(1):1-8. 被引量:1042
  • 2Banerjee M, George J, Song EY, et al. Tree-based model for breast cancer prognostication [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2004,22 ( 13 ) : 2567 - 2575. 被引量:1
  • 3Husted MA, Haugaard K, Soerensen J, et al. Arm morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection: a study from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group[J]. Breast,2008,17(2) : 138 -147. 被引量:1
  • 4Stachs A, Gde K, Hartmann S, et al. Accuracy of axillary ultrasound in preoperative nodal staging of breast cancer-size of metastases as limiting factor[J]. Springerplus, 2013, 2(1):350. 被引量:1
  • 5Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node ( IBCSG23-01 ) : a phase 3 randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol,2013,14(4) : 297 -305. 被引量:1
  • 6Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. AxXllary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial[ J]. JAMA, 2011, 305(6) : 569 -575. 被引量:1
  • 7Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Strayer ME, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer ( EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS) : a randomised, multieentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2014,15(12) : 1303 -1310. 被引量:1
  • 8Alvarez S, Anorbe E, Alcorta P, et al. Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review [ J ]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006,186 ( 5 ) : 1342 - 1348. 被引量:1
  • 9Houssami N, Ciatto S, Turner RM, et al. Preoperative ultra- sound-guided needle biopsy of axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer : meta-analysis of its accuracy and utility in staging the ax- ilia[J]. Ann Surg,2011,254(2) : 243 -251. 被引量:1
  • 10李洪林,姜玉新,郝玉芝,周纯武,陈宇.超声诊断乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的价值[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2006,3(4):237-239. 被引量:17

二级参考文献10

共引文献1057

同被引文献101

引证文献10

二级引证文献147

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部