摘要
现行《刑事诉讼法》确立了侦查人员出庭说明情况制度,但没有作出系统性的规定,故司法实务中此类案例依然鲜见。侦查人员出庭说明情况之不得已是其作为程序证人出庭对证据收集合法性接受质证,但鉴于侦查职业的特殊性,应有别于普通证人出庭作证。为完善侦查人员出庭说明情况制度,需制定出庭的具体步骤、设立出庭的保障措施、明确拒不出庭的法律后果,同时赋予侦查人员公务秘密拒证权等权利和义务,促进控辩双方均衡对抗,达到有效质证的目的。
The Criminal Procedure Law established the system of Investigators to Testify in Court without systemic provisions. Judicial practice in such cases is still rare. The investigators to testify in court accepts crossexamination on the legality of collecting evidence. Because of particularity profession,they should be different from the ordinary witnesses to testify. In order to improve the system of the investigators to testify in court,it is necessary to formulate specific steps,safeguard measures and the legal consequences of violation,and stipulate rights and obligations of resistance to testify,and to promote the balance of the prosecution and the defendants,achieving the goal of effective cross-examination.
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
2016年第5期81-89,共9页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
重庆市人民检察院检察理论研究课题"侦查人员出庭制度研究"的阶段性成果(项目编号:CJYFY2015A015)
关键词
侦查人员出庭
证据收集合法性
质证
制度完善
the investigators to testify in court
the legality of collecting evidence
cross-examination
system consummation
