摘要
犯罪中止的任意性判断,一直以来是中止犯问题的核心所在。因其判断的复杂性备受学界关注和争议,在此基础上形成了众多的学说,大致有主观说、客观说、限定的主观说以及折中说等。在对国内外主要学说介绍分析的基础上,认为各个学说对于犯罪中止任意性的判断都存在着固有的缺陷,目前最有效的途径是在现有学说的基础上进一步完善。因此,任意性的判断标准,应当坚持主观说,以行为人的意思为切入点,对"因自己的意思"而放弃犯罪的不同情形进行具体的判断与认定。根据这一任意性的判断标准,实践中有关任意性判断的具体争议问题能够得到有效的解决。
Arbitrary judgment of criminal discontinuation has been the core problem of discontinuing crime. Because of its complexity, it has attracted much attention and controversy in the academic field. On the basis of the formation of a number of doctrines, generally speaking, the objectivism, subjectivism and the compromise, etc. On the basis of the analysis of the main doctrines at home and abroad, it is believed that all doctrines have inherent defects in the judgment of criminal discontinuation. At present, the most effective way is to perfect these doctrines. Therefore, arbitrary judgment criterion should adhere to the subjectivism and keep its key points on the criminal＇s intention. As for the offender, he or she gives up the differences between the crime of specific judgment and recognition. According to arbitrary judgment criterion, in the practice of specific controversial questions about arbitrary judgment canbe effectively solved.
出处
《四川职业技术学院学报》
2016年第4期17-21,共5页
Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College
关键词
犯罪中止
任意性
判断标准
Discontinuance of Crime
Arbitrariness
Criterion
