摘要
目前在我国引渡或遣返外逃贪腐人员的过程中,死刑不引渡一直是困扰反腐国际合作的最大程序障碍之一。由于我国贪污受贿犯罪中的死刑适用在相当长时间内继续存在,充分有效不判处死刑的量刑承诺就成为化解该障碍的主要途径。我国的反腐司法格局、引渡现状决定了我们要正视死刑适用的客观性。无论是人权与主权的博弈、制度是否违宪方面,还是适用法律是否平等方面,量刑承诺制度均存在诸多争议和不完善之处,但并不足以否定量刑承诺制度的合理性和必要性。通过借鉴美国、英国和日本等国量刑承诺制度的现状,在我国量刑承诺制度有效存续的前提下,我们应从透明化、制度化等方面对量刑承诺的流转程序、作出程序、承诺内容等方面加以完善,增强量刑承诺的有效性和权威性。
At present non-extradition for death penalty is one of the biggest procedural barriers confronting anti-corruption international cooperation in the process of extraditing or repatriating corrupt personnel fleeing to other countries. Since the application of death penalty to corrupt criminals in China will still exist for a long time, the commitment of no death penalty will become a major way to resolve this barrier. The status quo of anti-cor-ruption justice and extradition in China determines that we should pay attention to the objectiveness of applying death penalty. Although there are many disputes or defects in the application of penalty commitment system, it is still necessary and reasonable to apply this system. By referring to the relevant systems in American, UK and Ja-pan, we shall improve this system from the aspects of transfer procedure, agreement procedure and commitment content and enhance the effectiveness and authority of penalty commitment.
出处
《政法学刊》
2016年第3期96-105,共10页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
量刑承诺
死刑不引渡
反腐
国际合作
penalty commitment
non-extradition for death penalty
anti-corruption
international coop-eration
