摘要
目的探讨新人职护士在规范化培训期间的心理健康状况，为制定相应措施提供科学依据。方法使用艾森克个性问卷（EPQ）、症状白评量表（SCL-90）、领悟社会支持量表（PSSS）、特质应对方式问卷（TCSQ）等标准化心理测评工具和自编一般情况调查表，对山东大学齐鲁医院141名护士轮转科室前及轮转1年后进行问卷调查，对照组同期进行相同问卷调查。结果与轮转前和对照组比较，轮转护士SCL一90的强迫、焦虑、人际敏感因子分明显升高，差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。Pearson相关分析显示，轮转护士SCL-90强迫因子得分与EPQ—N、P维度得分，TCSQ的消极应对得分呈正相关（P〈0．05；r1=0．537；r2=0．407；r3=0．701），与EPQ．E维度得分、PSSS总分以及TCSQ积极应对得分呈负相关（P〈0．05；r1=-0．621；r2=-0．671；r3=-0．312）；焦虑与EPQ—N、P维度得分、TCSQ消极应对得分呈正相关（P〈0．05．r1=0．607；r2=0．409；r3=0．764），与EPQ—E维度得分、PSSS总分以及TCSQ积极应对得分呈负相关（P〈0．05；r1=-0．569；r2=-0．723；r3=-0．418）；人际敏感因子得分与EPQ—N、P维度得分，TCSQ消极应对得分呈正相关（P〈0．05；r2=0．611；r2=0．687；r3=0．773），与EPQ—E维度得分、PSSS总分及TCSQ积极应对得分呈负相关（P〈0．05；r1=-0．506；r2=-0．693；r3=-0．307）。结论轮转护士心理健康状态明显低于非轮转护士，社会支持不足、消极应对方式以及不稳定性人格特征是影响轮转护士心理健康的主要危险因素。
Objective To explore the mental health status for new nurse during the standardization training period and provide scientific basis for managers to formulate corresponding measures. Methods Using eysenck personality questionnaire （EPQ） and symptom self-assessment scale （SCL-90）, understanding social support scale （PSSS）, trait coping style questionnaire （TCSQ） and other standardized psychological assessment tools and self designed general situation questionnaire, 141 nurses in our hospital before rotary department and 1 year later accepted the questionnaire survey while the control group accepted the same questionnaire. Results Compared with before rotary department and the control group, the forced, anxiety and interpersonal sensitivity tactor increased significantly in SCL-90 for rotary nurse and the differences were significant statistical significance （P〈0.05） ; Pearson correlation analysis showed rotary nurse SCL-90 forcing factor scores and EPQ-E dimension scores, TCSQ negative coping scores were positively correlated （P〈0.05; r1=0.537;r2=0.407; r3= 0.701 ）, and were negatively correlated with EPQ-E dimension scores, PSSS scores and TCSQ active responding score（P〈0.05; r1=-0.621 ; r2=-0.671 ; r3=-0.312） ; Anxiety was positively correlated with EPQ-N, PSSS scores and TCSQ negative responding score （P〈0.05; r1=0.607; r2=0.409; r3=0.764）, was negatively correlated with EPQ-E dimension scores, PSSS scores and TCSQ positive responding score （P〈0.05 ; r1=-0.569 ; r2=-0.723 ; r3= -0.418）; Interpersonal sensitivity factor score was positively correlated with EPQ-N, P dimension scores and TCSQ negative coping scores （P〈0.05; r1=0.611 ; r2=0.687 ; r3=0.773）, was negatively correlated with EPQ-E dimension scores, PSSS scores and TCSQ active responding score （P〈0.05 ; r1=-0.506 ; r2=-0.693 ; r3=-0.307）. Conclusion Rotal-y nurse mental health status was significantly lower than non-rotary nurse.Insufficient social support, negative coping style and instability pe
出处
《中华劳动卫生职业病杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2016年第7期498-501,共4页
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
基金
山东省医务职工科技创新项目（2014-28）
山东省软科学研究计划项目（2013RKE27007）
山东大学齐鲁医院内课题（2015QLMS54）
关键词
轮转护士
心理健康
人格特征
领悟社会支持
应对方式
Rotary nurse
Mental health
Personality characteristics
Perceived social support
Coping style
