期刊文献+

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠状动脉左主干病变长期疗效分析 被引量:2

Long-term effect of percutaneous coronary intervention on left main coronary artery lesion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗冠状动脉左主干(LMCA)病变的长期疗效。方法回顾性分析2009年7月至2014年6月在上海长海医院行冠状动脉造影并支架植入术的128例LMCA病变患者的临床资料,统计LMCA病变类型、支架植入情况及主要心脏不良事件(MACE)。结果 128例患者LMCA病变狭窄程度为50.00%-100.00%,平均(72.20±10.63)%;LMCA病变位于开口部24例(18.75%),体部14例(10.94%),累及远端分叉部90例(70.31%)。128例患者均成功植入支架,支架植入成功率为100.00%,单支架术50例(39.07%),双支架术78例(60.93%),共植入药物洗脱支架206枚,支架平均直径为(3.69±0.40)mm,平均长度为(21.99±6.83)mm。128例患者均获得随访,平均随访(50.97±17.15)个月,术后发生MACE 21例(16.40%),包括非致死性心肌梗死5例(3.90%)、靶血管再次血运重建11例(8.59%)和全因死亡5例(3.90%),生存率为96.09%(123/128)。结论 LMCA病变患者行冠状动脉内支架植入术治疗安全、有效。应根据LMCA病变的部位、分型及复杂程度,评估PCI获益和风险,科学地制定治疗策略。 Objective To investigate the long-term effect of percutaneous coronary intervention( PCI) in the treatment of left main coronary artery( LMCA) lesion. Methods The clinical data of 128 patients with LMCA lesion who underwent coronary angiography and stent implantation in Changhai Hospital of Shanghai City from July 2009 to June 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The type of LMCA lesion,stent implantation and major adverse cardiac event( MACE) were observed. Results The average stenosis of LMCA in 128 patients was( 72. 20 ± 10. 63) %( range 50. 00%- 100. 00%). The LMCA ostial,shaft and bifurcation lesions were 24( 18. 75%),14( 10. 94%) and 90( 70. 31%) cases respectively. A total of 128 patients were successfully implanted stents,the success rate of stent implantation was 100. 00%. Among the patients,single stent implantation was performed in 50 cases( 39. 07%),and double stent implantation was performed in 78 cases( 60. 93%). A total of 206drug-eluting stent were implanted. The average diameter of the stent was( 3. 69 ± 0. 40) mm,and the average length was( 21. 99 ± 6. 83) mm. A total of 128 patients were followed up for( 50. 97 ± 17. 15) months. MACE occurred in 21 cases( 16. 40%) after operation,including 5 cases( 3. 90%) of non-fatal myocardial infarction,11 cases( 8. 59%) of target vessel revascularization,5 cases( 3. 90%) of all-cause death. The survival rate was 96. 09%( 123 /128). Conclusion Coronary artery stent implantation in LMCA lesions is safe and effective. Operators should scientifically formulate treatment strategies by evaluating the benefit and risk of LMCA on the basis of lesion position,type and complexity.
出处 《新乡医学院学报》 CAS 2016年第6期473-475,共3页 Journal of Xinxiang Medical University
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:81370266) 上海市科学技术委员会基金资助项目(编号:134119a0301)
关键词 冠状动脉左主干 冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病 经皮冠状动脉介入 支架植入术 left main coronary artery coronary atherosclerotic heart disease percutaneous coronary intervention stent implantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1MOHR F W,MORICE M C,KAPPETEIN A P,et al. Coronary ar- tery bypass graft surgery versus coronary intervention in patientswith throe-vessel disease and left main coronary disease:5-year fol- low-up of the randomized, clinical SYNTAX trial [ J ]. Lancet, 2013,381 ( 9867 ) :629-638. 被引量:1
  • 2中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2012,40(4):271-277. 被引量:426
  • 3玉献鹏,吕树铮,何继强,高阅春,罗亚玮,宋现涛,苑飞,黄方炯,顾承雄,陈方.无保护左主干病变患者血运重建术的长期预后[J].中华心血管病杂志,2015,43(5):399-403. 被引量:9
  • 4姚海木,孙同文,张晓娟,万有栋,付新,沈德良,张金盈,李凌.急性冠脉综合征患者植入国产药物支架的长期疗效和安全性分析[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2015,24(1):62-67. 被引量:7
  • 5FAJADET J, CHIEFO A. Curent management of left main coronary artery disease[J]. Eur Heart J,2012,33 ( 1 ) :36-50b. 被引量:1
  • 6IZUMIKAWA T, SAKAMOTO S, TAKESHITA S, et al. Outcomes of primary pereutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with unprotected left main coronary artery occlusion[ J]. Catheter Cardiovasc lnterv, 2012,79 ( 7 ) : 1111-1116. 被引量:1
  • 7Task Force on Myocardial Revaseularization of the European Socie- ty of Cardiology (ESC) , European Association for Cardio-Thoracie Surgery (EACTS). 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revaseularization [ J]. Eur Heart J,2014,35 ( 37 ) :2541-2619. 被引量:1
  • 8KIM W J, KIM Y H, PARK D W, et al. Comparison of single-ver- sus two-stent techniques in treatment of unprotected left main coro- nary bifurcation disease [ J 1- Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2011,77 (6) :775-782. 被引量:1
  • 9PALMERINI T, MARZOCCHI A, TAMBURINO C,et al. Impact of bifurcation technique on 2-year clinical outcomes in 773 patients with distal unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug-eluting stentts [ J ]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2008,1 ( 3 ) : 185-192. 被引量:1
  • 10张颖,谷国强,崔炜.冠状动脉左主干远端病变介入治疗的预后因素[J].临床荟萃,2013,28(12):1425-1427. 被引量:1

二级参考文献67

  • 1刘志辉,王平,张建盛.国产雷帕霉素药物涂层支架在经皮冠状动脉介入术中的应用[J].山东医药,2009,49(51):15-15. 被引量:3
  • 2马剑英,葛均波,李敬田,钱菊英,姚荣国.国产支架在急性心肌梗死患者急诊冠状动脉介入治疗中的安全性和疗效[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2006,15(10):873-875. 被引量:8
  • 3Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555. 被引量:1
  • 4Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651. 被引量:1
  • 5Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210. 被引量:1
  • 6Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13. 被引量:1
  • 7Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972. 被引量:1
  • 8Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932. 被引量:1
  • 9Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx. 被引量:1
  • 10Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes ( CURRENT-OASIS 7 ): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet,2010,376 : 1233-1243. 被引量:1

共引文献439

同被引文献25

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部