摘要
在对我国宪法序言的解释中,存在两种有缺陷的解释趋向。一种是把序言中的历史叙事抽象化为哲学时间,从而把宪法的正当性直接奠定在真理之中。这种趋向忽视了我国宪法历史叙事具体的、历史的特点,即序言中的历史时间总是被具体化了的历史时间段落。具体化的历史时间是社会主义宪法的政治性得以展开的方式,因此第一种趋向也就忽视了宪法正当性固有的政治品格。另一种解释趋向是强调序言的政治品性,强调其中宣告的人民主权具有特殊的复合结构,却因此忽视了这一主权结构本来就带有时间和进化的维度。只有理解到序言表述的是一种时间化的政治——法权结构,才能恰当地把握到贯穿我国社会主义宪法史的历史主义传统,把握到在其中跃动的活的时间。
There are two deficient interpretations of our Con regard those historical narratives in this foreword as certain kind stltutlo of phil n＇s osop for hy. eword. The first tends to It legitimizes the Consti tution directly by truth of philosophy. However it overlooks the concrete feature of these historical narra- tives： they are always specified as concrete periods of history. Since the political characteristic of the Con- stitution develops in the frame of these concrete periods of history, what this first interpretation omits is the political characteristic of a constitution. The second interpretation, correctly emphasizing that the people＇s sovereignty declared in the foreword has a specific mension of history or evolution in this structure. We have could take both political character and historical dimension foreword of our Constitution is exactly a political--legal stru we try to grasp the socialist constitutionalist tradition. dualistic structure, ignores the inherent di- to develop a new kind of interpretation that into account. What has been declared in the cture--in--time. Only from this point on can
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期583-592,共10页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
北京市哲学社会科学规划项目“宪法序言的规范属性与实施问题研究”(项目编号:13FXC027)的阶段性成果
关键词
宪法序言
历史时间
主权结构
社会主义宪法传统
Constitution＇ s Foreword
Historical Time
The Structure of Sovereignty
Socialist Con stitutuionalist Tradition
