期刊文献+

高管薪酬对银行风险承担及绩效影响的实证研究——基于我国上市银行的数据检验 被引量:3

Empirical Research on the Influence of Executive Pay on Bank Risk Taking and Performance:Based on the Empirical Research on the Listed Banks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用2000—2014年我国上市银行的样本数据,实证检验银行高管薪酬对银行风险承担及绩效的影响。银行高管薪酬与银行违约距离风险(DD)呈显著的倒U型关系,与银行资产收益率(ROA)也呈显著的倒U型关系。进一步的稳定性检验(使用不同的风险和绩效指标)同样证实,银行高管薪酬与银行风险承担及绩效都呈稳定的显著倒U型关系:当银行高管薪酬达到448万元时,银行绩效由上升趋势转为下降趋势;当银行高管薪酬达到594万元时,银行风险承担水平由上升趋势转为下降趋势。从目前银行高管薪酬的平均水平(225.4万元)来看,我国银行绩效与风险承担正处在随高管薪酬增加而不断上升的阶段。因此,当银行高管薪酬达到临界值(约为448万元和594万元)时,需格外关注银行的风险承担行为和绩效水平。 The paper uses the sample of Chinese listed Banks in 2000-2014 data to empirically test the executive pay effects on bank risk taking and performance. Empirical research shows that the level of executive pay presents an inverted U type with the risk of bank default distance( DD); executive pay level and bank return on assets( ROA) also showed a significant inverted-U relations. Further stability tests( using different risk and performance indicators) also confirmed that the relation between the level of executive pay and bank risk taking is marked significantly U-shaped curve. In addition,further estimates found that when executive pay reached 4 million 480 thousand Yuan,the bank performance from the rise to fall trend; executive pay reached5 million 940 thousand Yuan,the bank's risk level from the rise to fall. From the current level of executive pay( 2 million 254 thousand Yuan),the performance and risk of the banking industry in China is in a period of rising with the increase of executive pay. When the bank executive pay reaches critical value( 4 million 480thousand and 5 million 940 thousand Yuan),we should focus more on bank risk taking and the performance.
出处 《阅江学刊》 2016年第1期39-52,144-145,共14页 Yuejiang Academic Journal
基金 教育部人文社科基金"内部公司治理对银行风险承担行为影响研究"(10YJC790149)
关键词 银行高管薪酬 银行风险承担 银行绩效 上市银行 薪酬监管 薪酬激励 Executive pay of banks bank risk taking bank performance listed bank pay regulation pay incentives
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献136

共引文献492

同被引文献30

  • 1李维安,曹廷求.股权结构、治理机制与城市银行绩效——来自山东、河南两省的调查证据[J].经济研究,2004,39(12):4-15. 被引量:229
  • 2HUANG Y S, WANG C J. Corporate governance and risk - taking of Chinese firms:the role of board size [ J]. Interna- tional Review of Economics & Finance, 2015 ( 37 ) : 96 - 113. 被引量:1
  • 3NAKANO M, NGUYEN P. Board size and corporate risk - taking:further evidence from Japan [ J ]. Corporate Govern- ance : An International Review, 2012 (20) : 369 - 387. 被引量:1
  • 4MINTON B, TAILLARD J, WILLIAMSON R. Financial ex- pertise of the board, risk taking, and performance: evidence from bank holding companies [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis ,2014,49( 2 ) :351 - 380. 被引量:1
  • 5SHEHZAD C T, DE HAAN J, SCHOLTENS B. The impact of bank ownership concentration on impaired loans and cap- ital adequacy [ J ]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2010,34 (2) :399 -408. 被引量:1
  • 6AGUSMAN A, GRANT S C, DOMINIC G, et al. Govern- ment intervention, bank ownership and risk - taking during the Indonesian financial crisis [ J ]. Pacific - Basin Finance Journal,2014(30) :114 - 131. 被引量:1
  • 7YAMILEH G K, MARIA -TERESA M, ROBERTO M. Shareholder diversification and bank risk taking[ J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2016, forthcoming. 被引量:1
  • 8CHENG I, HONG H, SCHEINKMAN J A. Yesterday' s heroes : compensation and risk at financial firms [ J ]. Jour- nal of Finance,2015 (70) : 839 - 879. 被引量:1
  • 9JENSEN M C, MECKLING W H. Theory of firm - Manage- rial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976,3 (4) : 305 - 360. 被引量:1
  • 10RAVIV A, SISLI- CIAMARRA E. Executive compensa- tion, risk taking and the state of the economy [ J ]. Journalof Financial Stability,2013,9 ( 1 ) : 55 - 68. 被引量:1

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部