期刊文献+

梅毒血清学诊断的系统评价 被引量:1

Systemic estimation of syphilis serologic diagnosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 ①目的系统评价快速血浆反应素试验(RPR)及酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)在梅毒血清学诊断中的价值。②方法运用Cochrane系统评价方法,检索中文和英文1996~2014年数据库,提取数据信息,应用RevMan 4.2软件进行系统分析。③结果共检索到相关文献92篇,评价后纳入15篇。Meta分析后显示,RPR同ELISA相比,阳性预测值OR为0.54,95%置信区间为0.39~0.74,敏感度OR为0.13,95%置信区间为0.09~0.19。④结论在梅毒血清学诊断中,ELISA法诊断价值高于RPR法。 Objective Systemic assessing the value of RPR and ELISA in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis.Methods Cochrane assessment was used to perform this paper. Published materials written in Chinese and English from 1996~2014 were searched via internet database, and then analysis was performed by RevMan 4.2 software. Results 92 records were acceptable, 15 were adopted after assessment. Being treated with RevMan 4.2, it indicated that the OR of the positive predictive values of RPR to ELISA was 0.54, and the 95% CI was 0.39~0.74. The OR of the sensitivity and its 95% CI were as the following, 0.13, 0.09~0.19.Conclusion The diagnositic value of ELISA is higher than that of RPR in the confirmation of syphilis.
作者 高辉 裴银辉
出处 《河北联合大学学报(医学版)》 2016年第1期27-29,共3页 Journal of North China Coal Medical College
关键词 梅毒 RPR ELISA 系统评价 Syphilis.RPR.ELISA.Sytemic estimation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1周方满.几种检测梅毒血清学试验的结果比较[J].现代实用医学,2007,19(5):389-390. 被引量:7
  • 2Tran T,Lowry AM,Serag HB. Meta-analysis: the effica- cy of over- the- counter gastro - oesophageal reflux dis- ease therapies[-J-. Alimentary Pharmacology and Thera- peuties, 2012,125(2) :143-153. 被引量:1
  • 3Raymond S, Irene E, Martin,et al.Serological diagnosis of syphilis: comparison of the Trep-Chek IgO enzymeimmu- noassay with other screening and confirmatory tests[-J-. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, 2013, 51 (5)- 118-124. 被引量:1

二级参考文献5

共引文献6

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部