期刊文献+

语用学中的“情”与“理” 被引量:4

Emotion and Reason in Pragmatic Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于对语用学派别底层所蕴涵的情与理的发掘以及二者间的博弈进行梳理后发现,作为研究语言使用的人文探索,对情感的重视表明了语用学研究的转向:从理性到情感、从抽象概括到具体分析、从宏观探索到微观精细化的趋势,研究更加关注主体情感态度对语言交际与含义推导的影响,回归了对语言使用者和主观语境的关注。这也体现了Kecskes(2014)所倡导的社会认知语用学的研究取向:交际的个体特征与社会特征并重,也契合姜望琪(2014a/b/c,2015)对语境主观因素的强调。 By exploring the underlying emotional and rational aspects in communication, this paper reveals an emotional turn in pragmatics as a humanistic study of language use. Such a shift from reason to emotion, from macro-abstraction to detailed differentiation and specification, highlights the effect on communication and the working of implicature by participants' emotive attitudes and stances, and its return to the concern of human beings and the subjective aspects of context, which echoes to the socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics proposed by Kecskes(2014), and to the inference model initiated by Jiang(2014a/b/c, 2015), with both of the individual traits and social traits of communication being taken into consideration.
作者 姚晓东
出处 《天津外国语大学学报》 2016年第1期8-12,80,共5页 Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University
基金 北京市高等学校青年英才计划项目"语用学思想史研究及其中国化:1930-2012"(YETP0784)
关键词 理性 情感 社会认知语用学 主观语境 人际语用学 reason emotion socio-cognitive pragmatics subjective context interpersonal pragmatics
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Arens, E. 1994. The Logic of Pragmatic ThinMng: From Peirce to Habermas[M]. New Jersey: Humanities Press. 被引量:1
  • 2Asher, N. & A. Lascarides. 2013. Strategic Conversation [J]. Semantics & Pragmatics, (6) : 1-62. 被引量:1
  • 3Bertuccelli-Papi, M. 2001. Where Grice Feared to Tread: Inferring Attitudes and Emotions [A]. In Giovanni Consenza (ed.). Paul Grice's Heritage[C]. Tumhout: Brepols. 被引量:1
  • 4Blutner, R. 2000. Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation[J]. Journal of Semantics, (17): 189-216. 被引量:1
  • 5Blutner, R. & H. Zeevat. 2004. Optimal Theory andPragmatics [C]. Hampshire: Palgrave. 被引量:1
  • 6Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1
  • 7Culpeper, J. 2011. Impoliteness [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1
  • 8Culpeper, J. & M. Haugh. 2014. Pragmatics and the English Language [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 被引量:1
  • 9Gee, P. 2011. How to Do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit [M]. New York: Routledge. 被引量:1
  • 10Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 被引量:1

二级参考文献271

共引文献225

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部