摘要
中国新疆阿拉山口口岸通过铁路进口哈萨克斯坦共和国石油及石油产品,但两国铁路轨距不同。为了控制两国贸易结算过程中的换装损失,对中国与独联体国家石油静态计量标准体系在现场检验、品质检测及数量计算等方面进行标准方法和实际检验结果的对比。结果表明中国与独联体国家在石油静态计量标准体系方面的理论和实际操作方法均存在差异:现场检验方面的差异通过批次检验基本可控制在1‰以内,品质检测方面主要应注意水分检测结果的差异,而数量计算方面则在不同计量温度和不同标准下呈现出不同的规律。在贸易合同质量、数量交接条款洽谈中,应该依据上述差异,规避贸易损失,尽量争取有利于维护国家和企业利益的条款。
At the Alataw Pass in Xinjiang, China, petroleum and related products are imported from the Republic of Kazakhstan through railway. However, the railway gauges in these two countries are different. In order to control the reloading loss in the trade settlement process, comparison was made on standard methods and actual inspection results bas per China and Commonwealth of Independent States （CIS） petroleum static measurement standards in the aspects of on-site inspection, quality detection and quantitative calculation. The results show that there are some differences in the theoretical and actual operation methods in the petroleum static measurement standards between China and CIS. Specifically, the difference in the aspect of on-site inspection can be controlled within 1%o through batch inspection. For quality detection, differences in moisture detection results should be considered. In the aspect of quantity calculation, different rules are obtained under different measuring temperatures and different standards. During the negotiation on clauses concerning the delivery of quality and quantity under trading contract, the above differences should be considered to avoid trade losses and get the clauses benefiting our country and the enterprises in China. （2 Figures, 2 Tables, l0 References）
出处
《油气储运》
CAS
北大核心
2015年第12期1323-1327,共5页
Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
关键词
中国
独联体
石油
静态计量
标准
对比
China, Commonwealth of Independent States （CIS）, petroleum, static measurement, standard, comparison
