摘要
最近几年来,与中国极具相似之处的印度是以中国为标准,把中国六十年的发展经验作为观照他们现实的尺度。印度学者以中国为背景,认为中印两国现代化道路的不同,主要源自于两国不同的土地制度。中国自1950年开始实施的土地集体所有制为改革开放三十年的成功转型奠定了制度性基础,并用革命、阶级的叙事割裂了与传统的联系,减少了现代化的发展阻碍。与此不同,在印度,与种姓结构、村落制度纠缠在一起的土地制度,使得它的现代化的道路极为曲折。因此,中印两国土地制度以及历史传统和现实关系的比较,对于我们反思中国的现实问题就显得尤为重要。
In recent years, Indian scholars started to take China as standard to reflect upon the development process of India. They think the different modernization pathways of India and China stem from the different land systems of these two countries. The collective land system since 1950 has laid institutional foundation for the successful transformation of China after the opening and reform. Besides, the revolution and class struggle severed China＇s connection with traditions, and overcome the obstacles to modernize. In India, however, the private land ownership, together with caste and village systems, has made their path of modernization a tortuous one. The Sino-Indian comparison in terms of land systems, historical traditions and current realities is important for us to reflect upon China＇s situation.
出处
《华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2015年第5期16-23,共8页
Journal of East China University of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition
关键词
土地制度
现代化道路
中印比较
land system
modernization path
Sino-Indian comparison
