摘要
本文比较了两个大规模的、推动农村就业的干预工程,即中国在1978年改革前高度集体化时代的劳动积累(LA)和印度2005年推出的"国家农村就业保障计划"(NREGS)。本文的比较目的在于,一方面,试图对中国的LA工程本身和其时间框架进行部分的再评价,并重新考查它和之后的发展阶段之间的相互影响。本文认为它不是一种浪费,而是为农村以及宏观经济转型提供了一个基础性的平台。另一方面,本文意图将中国的案例作为一个比较对象和独立的参考框架来为印度的NREGS计划提供一个侧面的视角,来指出该项目的一些缺点,发现它未被开发的发展潜能。
This paper compares two massive interventions designed to generate rural employment, that is, the phenomenon of labour accumulation （LA） in rural China in the period of high collectivism preceding the reforms of 1978, and the Indian initiative launched in 2005 the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme （NREGS）. It is motivated by dual objectives. On the Chinese side, it attempts a reappraisal of the Chinese intervention both in its own right and time frame, and also in terms of its interface with the subsequent era of development. We suggest that it was not just a plain waste, but laid a foundational platform for rural and macroeconomic transformation. On the Indian side, the motivation is to use the Chinese case as a comparator and independent frame of reference and to provide a lateral perspective, identifying some of the limitations of NREGS and its unexploited developmental potential.
出处
《华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2015年第5期1-15,共15页
Journal of East China University of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition
