摘要
类比"开放获取引用优势",此文提出"基金资助引用优势"作为衡量基金资助论文影响力的参量。用Web of Science数据库收录的2010—2012年基础学科论文数据进行实证研究,结果揭示除逻辑学外所有基础学科的基金资助引用优势为正,表明基金论文的被引频次和影响力普遍高于非基金论文。讨论分析了基金论文获得较高引用的原因,揭示基金论文更易获得引用是因其具有相对较高的品质。并针对基金资助引用优势为负的情形深入讨论,指出论文量是影响基金资助引用优势正负属性的主要因素。
Comparing with Open Access Citation Advantage （OACA）, it is proposed to apply Funding Citation Advantage （FCA） to measure the impact of funding papers in natural sciences. With using data from Web of Science 2010--2012, it is shown that all FCAs in natural sciences are positive, except in the field of logic. It is revealed in the reason analysis that the impact of funding papers is higher than that of non-funding ones, caused by higher quality. While deeper discussion, it is pointed out that the number of papers is the main factor that decides the positive or negative FCAs.
出处
《大学图书馆学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期11-16,共6页
Journal of Academic Libraries
