摘要
为正确认识和评价我国国家自然科学基金(National Natural Science Foundation of China,NSFC)资助项目的科研产出绩效,将科学引文索引数据库(Science Citation Index,SCI)收录的我国2010年所有科研论文(133 769篇)按照基金资助项目来源分为3组,NSFC论文(Ⅰ组)、其他基金论文(Ⅱ组)和无基金资助论文(Ⅲ组),详细统计3组论文数量和被引次数。结果表明,3组论文数分别为63570,42237和27962篇,被引次数(均数±标准差)分别为11.15±21.43,10.14±18.36和6.29±12.73,经Nemenyi检验,任意两组之间差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000),NSFC论文数及被引次数均明显高于另外两组论文,与无基金资助论文相比差异更加显著。对我国34个省级行政区2010年产出的NSFC资助的SCI论文数量、被引频次及其他绩效评价指标进行了比较,对NSFC资助产出SCI论文数最多的50个机构及其绩效指标进行了统计分析。
To correctly understand and evaluate research output performance of funding projects of National Natural Science Foundation of China( NSFC),we divided all papers published on Science Citation Index( SCI) in 2010 by Chinese authors into 3 groups according to resource of funds: NSFC papers( groupⅠ),other funds papers( group Ⅱ) and no funds papers( group Ⅲ),and we counted up the number of papers and their citations in detail with these 3 groups. The results showed that the number of papers in each group were 63570,42237 and 27962 respectively,the citation( mean ± standard deviation) were 11. 15 ± 21. 43,10. 14 ± 18. 36 and 6. 29± 12. 73. The Nemenyi test showed that the difference between any two groups had statistical significance( P = 0. 000),the number of NSFC papers and their citations were obviously higher than papers in other two groups,and the difference between NSFC papers and no funds papers was much more significant. We compared the number of papers,citations and other evaluation indicators of NSFC papers from 34 boroughs in our country in 2010,and we conducted the statistics analysis on the first 50 institutions producing the most NSFC papers and their performance indicators.
出处
《科学学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第4期507-515,共9页
Studies in Science of Science
基金
河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2012BZH004)
新乡医学院研究生科研创新支持计划项目(YJSCX201325Y)
关键词
国家自然科学基金
基金论文
资助效果
科研绩效
科学评价
National Natural Science Foundation of China
papers with funds
funding effect
research performance
science evaluation
