期刊文献+

中国燃煤电厂汞的物质流向与汞排放研究 被引量:21

The mercury mass flow and emissions of coal-fired power plants in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究中国燃煤电厂中汞的去向,基于2010年中国各省份燃煤中的汞含量、燃煤消耗量、燃煤电厂大气污染控制设备的安装比例以及粉煤灰、脱硫石膏的二次利用方式,计算了我国燃煤电厂2010年向大气、水体、土壤中排放汞的量.2010年我国电厂燃煤共输入汞271.7t(147.1~403.6t).煤炭在电厂燃烧一次排放到大气中的汞为101.3t(44.0~167.1t),进入燃煤副产物、水体的汞分别为167.4t(84.3~266.3t),3.0t(1.2~5.0t).燃煤副产物二次利用过程向大气排放的汞为32.7t(12.5~56.1t),进入土壤中的汞为58.6t(33.6~103.9t),还有76.1t(30.3~108.6t)汞留在了产品中.结果表明,粉煤灰用于水泥生产和粉煤灰制砖是副产物向大气中二次排放的重要源,分别占总二次排放量的81.7%和15.3%。 To investigata the fate of mercury (Hg) in coal burned at power plants in China, the amount of mercury released to the air, water and solid waste in 2010 were calculated based on the Hg content of coal, coal consumption, application rate of air pollution control devices, and the re-utilization of coal combustion by-products. All the Hg input of power plants came from coal, totally 271.7t (147.1~403.6t) in 2010. In coal-fired power plant, the mercury emitted to air, to byproducts, and to water were 101.3t (44.0~167.1t), 167.4t (84.3~266.3t) and 3.0t (1.2~5.0t), respectively. During the re-utilization of byproducts, the mercury emitted to air, released to soil and stored in products including cement, gypsum wallboard, and fly ash brick were 32.7t (12.5~56.1t), 58.6t (33.6~103.9t), and 76.1t (30.3~108.60, respectively. The results indicated that cement production and fly ash brick production were two important processes with atmospheric Hg re-emissions, accounting for 81.7% and 15.3% of the total Hg re-emissions.
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第8期2241-2250,共10页 China Environmental Science
基金 国家"973"项目(2013CB430001)
关键词 燃煤电厂 副产物 排放 物质流向 coal-fired power plants mercury byproduct emission material flow
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1蒋靖坤,郝吉明,吴烨,David G. Streets,段雷,田贺忠.中国燃煤汞排放清单的初步建立[J].环境科学,2005,26(2):34-39. 被引量:130
  • 2冯新斌,洪业汤.中国燃煤向大气排放汞量的估算[J].煤矿环境保护,1996,10(3):10-13. 被引量:18
  • 3王起超,沈文国,麻壮伟.中国燃煤汞排放量估算[J].中国环境科学,1999,19(4):318-321. 被引量:262
  • 4Mukherjce A B, Zevenhoven R, Bhattacharya P, et al. Mercury flow via coal and coal utilization by-products: A global perspective [J]. Resources, Conscrcation and Recycling, 2008,52(4):571-591. 被引量:1
  • 5Liu X, Wang S, Zhang L, et al. Speciation of mercury in FGD gypsum and mercury emission during the wallboard production in China [J]. Fuel, 2013,111:621:627. 被引量:1
  • 6Jasinski S M, The materials flow of mercury in the United States [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1995,15:145-179. 被引量:1
  • 7Mukherjee A B, Zevenhoven R, Brodersen J, Hylander L D, et al. Mercury in waste in the European Union:sources, disposal methods and risks [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2004,42(2): 155-182. 被引量:1
  • 8Sundseth K, Pacyna J M, Pacyna E G, et al. Substance flow analysis of mercury affecting water quality in the European Union [J]. Water Air Soil Pollut., 2012,223:429-442. 被引量:1
  • 9Chakraborty L B, Qureshi A, Vadenbo C, et al. Anthropogenic Mercury Flows in India and Impacts of Emission Controls [J]. Environmental Scinece and Technology, 2013,47:8105-8113. 被引量:1
  • 10中国电力年鉴编辑委员会.中国电力年鉴2010[K].北京:中国电力出版社,2010. 被引量:1

二级参考文献112

共引文献467

同被引文献242

引证文献21

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部