摘要
目前学界对反行政垄断诉讼研究较少,随着全国首起反行政垄断诉讼的立案受理以及新《行政诉讼法》第12条第8款的新增规定,将会引起理论界的极大关注。行政垄断具有较强的行政性、隐蔽性、目的性等特征,加之对抽象行政垄断是否可诉争议较大,使得反行政垄断诉讼呈现立案遭遇瓶颈、抽象行政垄断身处可诉性质疑、联合诉讼遭遇困境、行政垄断调查陷入真空状态等问题。反行政垄断诉讼应定位于以维护客观法秩序为旨的客观诉讼模式,因此,要从实体方面对行政垄断行为进行类型化分析,进而从程序方面对反行政垄断诉讼的诉讼规则重新架构。
The current studies about anti -administrative monopoly action research is less. With the first acceptance of anti - administrative monopoly litigation in the court, and the new provisions about the eighth article of the twelfth paragraph in the new administrative procedure law, it would cause great concern in the theoretical circle. Administrative monopoly has strong administrative, concealment, purpose, and the suability of abstract administrative monopoly is controversial. Which make the anti - administrative monopoly litigation face the bottlenecks in court , and the abstract administrative monopoly exposure to question of suability. Joint action encounter difficulties, the investigation of administrative monopoly fall into vacuum. The anti - administrative monopoly litigation should be positioned to objective litigation mode in order to protect the objective order of law . therefore, we should analyze the types of administrative monopoly behavior from the aspect of entity, and then re - architecture the procedure rules of the anti -administrative monopoly litigation from the aspect of procedure.
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2015年第2期82-89,共8页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
关键词
行政垄断
例示规定
反行政垄断诉讼
客观诉讼
他益性客观诉讼
administrative monopoly
illustrative provisions
anti - administrative monopoly litigation
objective litigation
objective litigation for other benefit
